What is it about?
This work exposes for the first time the beginning of scientific psychology from the professional struggles between physiologists and philosophers in the 1870s. Particularly analyzed is the debate between Adolf Horwicz and Wilhelm Wundt between 1879-1880 which is of vital importance to understand the beginning of psychology as a science in the German Empire. The history of psychology has erased almost all the records of the critics of Wundt's project of physiological psychology, one of them was Horwicz who besides offering an opposing model of psychology was also its greatest public contradictor.
Featured Image
Photo by Catarina Carvalho on Unsplash
Why is it important?
Using unpublished primary archives, this article reconstructs part of the history of the beginning of psychology, thus questioning the myth that psychology achieved its autonomy as a science after its separation from philosophy. On the contrary, it shows that psychology is largely a consequence of the invasion of German physiologists and natural scientists into the chairs of philosophy and historical sciences as part of certain scientific and cultural policies in the German Empire. This fact led to a professional struggle, the most representative case being that of Horwicz who harshly criticized the appointment of Wundt in Leipzig in 1875.
Perspectives
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: “My Opponent Prof. W.”: The debate between Wilhelm Wundt and Adolf
Horwicz in the beginning of physiological psychology
(1872–1879)., History of Psychology, November 2023, American Psychological Association (APA),
DOI: 10.1037/hop0000246.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page