What is it about?
Many scholars and journalists have discussed King Tubby's innovative studio dub remixing methods. However, there is very little literature that investigates Tubby's conceptual themes. Therefore, this article seeks to demonstrate the similarities between Tubby's studio methods and those of Canadian soundscape composers Barry Truax and Hildegard Westerkamp. In particular, I focus on common conceptual themes such as environmental context referenced through sound, past listening associations and ecologically informed sound processing effects.
Featured Image
Why is it important?
In music journalism and academic literature, King Tubby's music and Jamaican dub music in general is often categorized and analyzed as merely a genre of popular music distinct from and not as sophisticated as Western avant-garde and sound art practices. I argue that Tubby's remixing approach involves great conceptual depth and sonic experimentation. Exploring the conceptual similarities between Tubby’s technologically minimal or "diy" music and the established academic-affiliated genre of soundscape composition provides a new perspective on his work as reflecting a multifaceted musical approach that warrants further scholarly study. This article is the first academic study to ever compare Jamaican dub music to soundscape composition.
Perspectives
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: Sounding Riddims: King Tubby’s dub in the context of soundscape composition, Organised Sound, December 2017, Cambridge University Press,
DOI: 10.1017/s1355771817000310.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page