What is it about?

The Dogon "existential" particle originated as a discourse-definite 'there' adverb but developed into an existential (as in the 'X has Y' construction), and became involved in the focalization system.

Featured Image

Why is it important?

Shows that an ancestral 'there' particle can evolve in sharply different ways in different language families. For example, while the Dogon existential has some similarity to English [there] in [there is/are …], the Dogon particle is also regular in the 'X have Y' construction.

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: Dogon existential(-presentative) proclitics: Syntax, semantics, evolution, Lingua, October 2018, Elsevier,
DOI: 10.1016/j.lingua.2018.07.002.
You can read the full text:

Read

Contributors

The following have contributed to this page