What is it about?
This research asked whether people judge a stranger's offer of help differently depending on how familiar that helper seems to be with the place where the help is needed. Across four experiments with Kosovan Albanian and Swiss participants, both teenagers and adults, people imagined being in a difficult situation, such as missing the last bus home, or read about a fellow group member in the same situation, and learned that a stranger from either their own group or another group had offered to help. The situation was set either in a place mostly associated with the participant's own group or in a place mostly associated with the other group. When the difficulty happened in a place associated with the participant's own group, people judged a helper from their own group as more caring and capable than a helper from the other group, and were more willing to accept the other group's help. But when the same difficulty happened in a place associated with the other group, this gap shrank or disappeared, because people now saw the other-group helper as more familiar with that place and therefore better able to actually solve the problem. In other words, how much people trusted a stranger's kindness depended heavily on whether that stranger seemed equipped to help in that specific place, not just on which group the stranger belonged to.
Featured Image
Photo by Ethan Sykes on Unsplash
Why is it important?
Programmes that try to build trust between groups often focus on changing how people feel about each other. This research points to something more practical: whether a helper seems capable of actually solving the problem at hand. An offer of help from someone outside one's own group is more likely to be seen as genuine, and accepted, when that person appears to know the local terrain, whether that is a neighbourhood, a set of resources, or a particular system. This matters for designing cross-group assistance programmes, integration services, and reconciliation efforts: pairing helpers with situations where their practical knowledge is visible and relevant may do more to build trust than relying on goodwill alone. It also suggests a path for encouraging people to rely on outgroup members for help in outgroup settings, since doing so may itself demonstrate that outgroup's competence and reduce suspicion over time.
Perspectives
I kept noticing that an outgroup member's kindness was often read with suspicion, even though the act itself looked identical to what an ingroup member might do. I wanted to know whether that suspicion was really about distrust of the person, or about something more practical: whether people believed that helper could actually solve the problem. Testing this across very different settings, from Kosovan high schools to the streets of Geneva, showed me that a helper's perceived familiarity with the place mattered enormously. People did not just ask whether they trusted the helper, they asked whether the helper actually knew what they were doing there. That distinction has made me think differently about what reconciliation efforts need to build: not only warmer feelings between groups, but also visible evidence of competence.
Dr Islam Borinca
National University of Ireland Maynooth
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: “How can you help me if you are not from here?” Helper's familiarity with the context shapes interpretations of prosocial intergroup behaviors, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, March 2020, Elsevier,
DOI: 10.1016/j.jesp.2019.103944.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page
