What is it about?
The study finds that the idiosyncratic volatility (IVOL) effect weakens in Pakistan, where gambling is prohibited, and individual investors are less dominant. It reveals that stocks eligible for Islamic funds exhibit different IVOL premia. Further analysis based on prospect theory shows that the lowest-IVOL stocks rebound after negative returns, while the highest-IVOL stocks underperform after positive returns, indicating sentiment-driven behaviors. Zero-investment portfolios exploiting these mispricing anomalies outperform original strategies. Ultimately, the study concludes that the IVOL premium is linked to mispricing rather than risk.
Featured Image
Photo by Nick Chong on Unsplash
Why is it important?
This study is important because it addresses the idiosyncratic volatility (IVOL) puzzle in a unique context—Pakistan—where gambling is religiously prohibited. Examining the impact of cultural and investor composition on IVOL challenges existing assumptions about mispricing in stock markets. The findings offer valuable insights for investors and fund managers, particularly in understanding how sentiment and behavioral factors influence stock performance. Additionally, it contributes to the broader literature on market anomalies and the role of investor psychology in financial markets.
Perspectives
This study likely highlights its innovative approach to the IVOL puzzle in a culturally specific context. It appreciate how it challenges conventional theories by showing the influence of investor composition and sentiment on market behavior, viewing it as a valuable contribution to behavioral finance and practical investment strategies.
Dr Muhammad Usman Khurram
Zhejiang University
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: Idiosyncratic volatility and the cross-section of abnormal returns in Pakistan: Evidence from a country with religious bans on lotteries and substantive institutional investor participation, International Review of Economics & Finance, March 2025, Elsevier,
DOI: 10.1016/j.iref.2025.103883.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page







