What is it about?
Online cosmetics stores often offer dozens of similar shades — and that abundance can paralyze consumers rather than empower them. This study examines whether augmented reality (AR) virtual try-on tools can help shoppers navigate that overload and feel more confident in their choices. Drawing on the Stimulus-Organism-Response model and cognitive load theory, we designed an experiment with 256 North American women who either browsed an online lipstick store normally or used its AR virtual try-on feature. We also conducted two focus groups beforehand to ground our theoretical model in real consumer experiences. The results show that AR reduces the perception that all options look the same (perceived similarity) and eases the mental overwhelm caused by too many choices (confusion by overchoice). Together, these reductions lower the anxiety and doubt consumers feel before committing to a purchase — a state known as prepurchase cognitive dissonance — which in turn increases both their purchase intention and their willingness to pay a higher price for the chosen product.
Featured Image
Photo by Markus Winkler on Unsplash
Why is it important?
It is estimated that 60% of online sales opportunities are lost because consumers simply cannot decide. The paralysis created by large product assortments and visually similar options is a real and costly problem for e-commerce. This research shows that web-based AR — not just the mobile apps most studies have focused on — can meaningfully address that problem by reducing cognitive load at a critical moment in the customer journey. For retailers, the implication is practical and commercially significant: investing in AR virtual try-on tools is not just about innovation or brand image, but about directly improving conversion rates and profit margins. The study also adds nuance to the debate about whether AR might actually increase confusion by tempting consumers to try more options — our findings suggest that, in practice, the clarity AR provides more than compensates for any additional complexity.
Perspectives
I find the cognitive dissonance angle in this paper particularly compelling because it captures something every online shopper knows intuitively but that the AR literature had largely ignored: the anxiety of choosing between things that all look the same. Most AR studies had focused on positive outcomes — enjoyment, flow, engagement — without asking whether AR could also neutralize genuinely negative psychological states. The mixed-method design was essential here.
Sergio Barta
Universidad de Zaragoza
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: Using augmented reality to reduce cognitive dissonance and increase purchase intention, Computers in Human Behavior, March 2023, Elsevier,
DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2022.107564.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page







