What is it about?

This systematic literature review examines the use of the National Assessment Program – Literacy and Numeracy (NAPLAN) numeracy test results in peer-reviewed articles. NAPLAN is a nationwide testing program in Australia that assesses students' literacy and numeracy skills. The paper aims to investigate how these test results are utilised in the literature in relation to the purposes outlined by the Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority (ACARA).

Featured Image

Why is it important?

The study is important because it sheds light on the use of NAPLAN numeracy test results in educational research. By reviewing existing literature, the paper explores how these test results have been employed and whether they align with the intended purposes of the assessment. Understanding how NAPLAN results are utilised can provide insights into the effectiveness of the testing program and its impact on education. Additionally, the study highlights the potential misuse or expansion of standardised test results and emphasises the need for careful interpretation and application of such data.

Perspectives

The study reveals several perspectives regarding the use of NAPLAN numeracy test results. It shows that most of the reviewed articles utilised the test results to map student progress and identify strengths and weaknesses in teaching. However, a significant number of studies used the test results for purposes beyond those mentioned by ACARA, indicating a deviation from the intended use of NAPLAN. The findings suggest that the test results were sometimes used as the sole indicator of students' learning outcomes, despite the recommendation that they should be considered alongside other sources of information. The study also suggests that there is a need to communicate the purposes of test results clearly to researchers, policymakers, and the community, in order to avoid unintended policy responses and the narrowing of the curriculum. The study acknowledges its limitations, such as focusing only on the numeracy aspect of NAPLAN and excluding non-peer-reviewed sources. It suggests that future research could explore other dimensions of NAPLAN results and include a broader range of publications. Overall, the paper emphasises the importance of standardised testing but cautions against relying too heavily on any one indicator and highlights the need for further research to compare the use of standardised test results across different countries.

Dr Seyum Tekeher Getenet
University of Southern Queensland

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: Investigating the use of the National Assessment Program – Literacy and Numeracy (NAPLAN) test results, Studies In Educational Evaluation, September 2023, Elsevier,
DOI: 10.1016/j.stueduc.2023.101277.
You can read the full text:

Read

Contributors

The following have contributed to this page