What is it about?

Firms use robots to deliver an ever-expanding range of services. However, as service failures are common, service recovery actions are necessary to prevent user churn. This research further suggests that firms need to know how to design service robots that avoid alienating users in case of service failures. Robust evidence across two experiments demonstrates that users attribute successful service outcomes internally, while robot-induced service failures are blamed on the firm (and not the robot), confirming the well-known self-serving bias. While this external attributional shift occurs regardless of the robot design (i.e., it is the same for warm vs. competent robots), the findings imply that service recovery minimizes the undesirable external shift and that this effect is particularly pronounced for warm robots.

Featured Image

Why is it important?

Prioritizing service robots with a warm design maximizes user retention for either type of service outcome (i.e., success, failure, and failure with recovery).

Perspectives

Our study contributes to traditional HRI research as well as to recent HRI research on recommendations by robo-adivsors.

Dr Maik Hammerschmidt
Georg-August-Universitat Gottingen

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: Users taking the blame? How service failure, recovery, and robot design affect user attributions and retention, Electronic Markets, December 2022, Springer Science + Business Media,
DOI: 10.1007/s12525-022-00613-4.
You can read the full text:

Read

Resources

Contributors

The following have contributed to this page