What is it about?

In this article, the authors define ethics, discuss why researchers should care about ethics, and briefly review the history of ethics and the surrounding contemporary debate as related to research, the development of research ethics codes, research ethics legislation, and the formation of the human subjects research review boards in theWest with an emphasis on the United States’ Institutional Review Board. They then explicate the difference between minimalist ethical codes, which all respected researchers must adhere to, and an aspirational ethical stance. Culturally Responsive Relational Reflexive Ethics (CRRRE) is then advanced as a viable aspirational ethical stance for the research community. Finally, the authors draw on their own research for examples of ethical dilemmas involving ethnicity, age, sexual orientation, and power that CRRRE has helped illuminate.

Featured Image

Why is it important?

In order to increase the ethical nature of research, scholars need to attempt to be culturally responsive.

Perspectives

This article is foundational to my forthcoming text, Ethics in Social Science Research: Becoming Culturally Responsive.

Dr Maria K. E. Lahman
University of Northern Colorado

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: Culturally responsive relational reflexive ethics in research: the three rs, Quality & Quantity, July 2010, Springer Science + Business Media,
DOI: 10.1007/s11135-010-9347-3.
You can read the full text:

Read

Contributors

The following have contributed to this page