What is it about?
• Ideality describes the arts striving toward perfection, beauty and refinement in all aspects of life. For reality, the product should also fit into a context of use and meet user requirements. Transforming “ideality” into “reality” involves more than considering the product design itself. It remains a challenge to represent use contexts and user needs in a way that designers with technical backgrounds are able to make direct use of them. • 文化是經過體驗後形成的生活型態,需要大家的關心;創意是經過感動後的一種認同,需要文化加值;設計經由產品營造一種生活品味,需要無盡創意。簡約可以很創意,簡約可以很文化,簡約可以很設計;簡約也可以很繽紛,簡約也可以很美麗,簡約當然是簡潔有力。文化創意設計應該從文化的心理層次去轉化,轉化得宜才是創意,設計得當才是美麗。
Featured Image
Photo by Ernest Ojeh on Unsplash
Why is it important?
• When designing “arts” into “business”, we need a better understanding of human-art interaction not just for taking part in the humanity context, but also for developing the interactive experience of arts. Therefore, we propose a general framework for aesthetic design that applies to representing human-art interactions and translating aesthetics into user requirements in real product design cases. The intended purpose of this paper is to provide a framework for examining the way designers interact across the art and the interactive experiences of users in the design process. • 今天,文化創意設計變成顯學,設計師朗朗上口形成口號。但是在商業掛帥之下,所謂文化創意產品,往往只是一種商業噱頭。大部份的產品為了視覺美感,在產品上加了許多不必要的裝飾,例如,透過授權的原畫複製,從盤子、杯子到日常生活用品到處貼圖,無法達到透過文化創意加值設計,提昇日常生活品味的目的。設計的目的在於改善人類的生活品質,形成生活型態,提昇生活品味,豐富生活文化。
Perspectives
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: From Ideality to Reality- a Case Study of Mondrian Style, January 2016, Springer Science + Business Media,
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-40093-8_37.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page