What is it about?

I show that, contrary to what had been claimed in Statistics in Medicine previously, it was not reasonable to use the two-stage analysis of AB/BA cross-over designs.

Featured Image

Why is it important?

I provided a trick whereby the two-stage procedure could be modified to produce a test with the correct type-I error rate. I showed that when this was done there was no power advantage in using the two-stage analysis of cross-over trials compared to the simple strategy of always using the within-patient test. The previous claimed power advantage had been bought by inflating the Type I error rate.

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: LETTER TO THE EDITOR: The case for cross-over trials in phase III by B. J. Jones and J. Lewis,Statistics in Medicine,14, 1025-1038 (1995), Statistics in Medicine, September 1997, Wiley,
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0258(19970915)16:173.0.co;2-e.
You can read the full text:

Read

Resources

Contributors

The following have contributed to this page