What is it about?
With data collected from Chinese consumers, this article reported results of two studies. The first explored differences of two types of delegations of AI tools in consumer perceived benefits, barriers, and tensions about AI tool use. The second examined differences of these factors in various shopping stages. Two types of delegations can be understood as direct use and critically use of AI tools, respectively. Consumer tensions include emotional ambivalence, autonomy threat, and performance ambiguity.
Featured Image
Photo by Vitaly Gariev on Unsplash
Why is it important?
The first study shows that critically use of AI tools has potential to reduce emotional ambivalence and autonomy threat. The second study demonstrates that emotional ambivalence is higher in the discovery and comparison samples than in the purchase and post-purchase samples, whereas performance ambiguity and autonomy threat differ only in selected stage comparisons.
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: Substitutive and Augmentative Delegation in
GenAI
‐Assisted Shopping: Perceived Benefits, Constraints, and Consumer Tensions, Journal of Consumer Behaviour, August 2026, Wiley,
DOI: 10.1002/cb.70238.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page







