All Stories

  1. Experimental Insights into the Influence of Logic and Pragmatics on Conditional Argument Evaluation
  2. Two-Tier Fallacy Theory
  3. Breaking Plato’s Spell: Reimagining Rhetoric and Dialectic as Counterparts of Hermeneutics
  4. Finding the Missing Link: An Algorithmic Approach to Reconstructing Enthymemes
  5. Reconstructing Resistance: Pragmatic Argumentation Against Scientific Metaphor
  6. Annotating Legal Argument Schemes: A Parametric Approach
  7. Argument-checken als een methode voor het identificeren van misinformatie
  8. Argumentation in end-of-life conversations with families in Dutch intensive care units: a qualitative observational study
  9. Practical Reasoning and Practical Argumentation: A Stakeholder Commitment Approach
  10. Norms of Public Argumentation and the Ideals of Correctness and Participation
  11. How persuasive is AI-generated argumentation? An analysis of the quality of an argumentative text produced by the GPT-3 AI text generator
  12. Connecting ethics and epistemology of AI
  13. How to identify an argument type? On the hermeneutics of persuasive discourse
  14. Can an AI Analyze Arguments? Argument-Checking and the Challenges of Assessing the Quality of Online Information
  15. More than Relata Refero: Representing the Various Roles of Reported Speech in Argumentative Discourse
  16. The Philosophy of Argument
  17. Stock issues and the structure of argumentative discussions: An integrative analysis
  18. Evaluating Reasoning in Natural Arguments: A Procedural Approach
  19. How do scientists criticize the computer metaphor of the brain?
  20. Handbook of Argumentation Theory
  21. From fact-checking to rhetoric-checking: extending methods for evaluating populist discourse
  22. Annotating Argument Schemes
  23. Annotating Argument Schemes
  24. Annotation with adpositional argumentation
  25. An argumentative reconstruction of the computer metaphor of the brain
  26. Een pragma-dialectische reconstructie van de discussiebijdragen van arts en patiënt in ‘shared decision-making’
  27. Four basic argument forms
  28. Commentary on “The potential of argumentation theory in enhancing patient-centered care in breaking bad news encounters”
  29. Analogy, Similarity, and the Periodic Table of Arguments
  30. Revisiting Computational Models of Argument Schemes: Classification, Annotation, Comparison
  31. Argumentative Patterns for Justifying Scientific Explanations
  32. Review of J. Crosswhite, Deep Rhetoric: Philosophy, Reason, Violence, Justice, Wisdom
  33. Boekbesprekingen
  34. Reasonableness in Context: Taking into Account Institutional Conventions in the Pragma-Dialectical Evaluation of Argumentative Discourse
  35. Een systematische catalogus van argumenten
  36. Handbook of Argumentation Theory
  37. Review of M. Spranzi, The art of dialectic between dialogue and rhetoric: The Aristotelian tradition
  38. The Assessment of Argumentation from Expert Opinion
  39. Review of M. A. Finocchiaro, Defending Copernicus and Galileo: Critical Reasoning in the Two Affairs
  40. The pragma-dialectical account of argument schemes
  41. Zeno’s dialectische redenering