All Stories

  1. Experimental Insights into the Influence of Logic and Pragmatics on Conditional Argument Evaluation
  2. The Role of Rhetoric in Defending against Weapons of Mass Persuasion
  3. Two-Tier Fallacy Theory
  4. Breaking Plato’s Spell: Reimagining Rhetoric and Dialectic as Counterparts of Hermeneutics
  5. Finding the Missing Link: An Algorithmic Approach to Reconstructing Enthymemes
  6. Reconstructing Resistance: Pragmatic Argumentation Against Scientific Metaphor
  7. Annotating Legal Argument Schemes: A Parametric Approach
  8. Argument-checken als een methode voor het identificeren van misinformatie
  9. Argumentation in end-of-life conversations with families in Dutch intensive care units: a qualitative observational study
  10. Practical Reasoning and Practical Argumentation: A Stakeholder Commitment Approach
  11. Norms of Public Argumentation and the Ideals of Correctness and Participation
  12. How persuasive is AI-generated argumentation? An analysis of the quality of an argumentative text produced by the GPT-3 AI text generator
  13. Connecting ethics and epistemology of AI
  14. How to identify an argument type? On the hermeneutics of persuasive discourse
  15. Can an AI Analyze Arguments? Argument-Checking and the Challenges of Assessing the Quality of Online Information
  16. More than Relata Refero: Representing the Various Roles of Reported Speech in Argumentative Discourse
  17. The Philosophy of Argument
  18. Stock issues and the structure of argumentative discussions: An integrative analysis
  19. Evaluating Reasoning in Natural Arguments: A Procedural Approach
  20. How do scientists criticize the computer metaphor of the brain?
  21. Handbook of Argumentation Theory
  22. From fact-checking to rhetoric-checking: extending methods for evaluating populist discourse
  23. Annotating Argument Schemes
  24. Annotating Argument Schemes
  25. Annotation with adpositional argumentation
  26. An argumentative reconstruction of the computer metaphor of the brain
  27. Een pragma-dialectische reconstructie van de discussiebijdragen van arts en patiënt in ‘shared decision-making’
  28. Four basic argument forms
  29. Commentary on “The potential of argumentation theory in enhancing patient-centered care in breaking bad news encounters”
  30. Analogy, Similarity, and the Periodic Table of Arguments
  31. Revisiting Computational Models of Argument Schemes: Classification, Annotation, Comparison
  32. Argumentative Patterns for Justifying Scientific Explanations
  33. Review of J. Crosswhite, Deep Rhetoric: Philosophy, Reason, Violence, Justice, Wisdom
  34. Boekbesprekingen
  35. Reasonableness in Context: Taking into Account Institutional Conventions in the Pragma-Dialectical Evaluation of Argumentative Discourse
  36. Een systematische catalogus van argumenten
  37. Handbook of Argumentation Theory
  38. Review of M. Spranzi, The art of dialectic between dialogue and rhetoric: The Aristotelian tradition
  39. The Assessment of Argumentation from Expert Opinion
  40. Review of M. A. Finocchiaro, Defending Copernicus and Galileo: Critical Reasoning in the Two Affairs
  41. The pragma-dialectical account of argument schemes
  42. Zeno’s dialectische redenering