All Stories

  1. Phase II Study (NO LIMIT, WJOG13320G) of First-Line Nivolumab Plus Low-Dose Ipilimumab for Microsatellite Instability–High Advanced Gastric or Esophagogastric Junction Cancer
  2. Chromosomal Instability Is Associated with cGAS–STING Activation in EGFR-TKI Refractory Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer
  3. Publisher Correction: HER2-related biomarkers predict clinical outcomes with trastuzumab deruxtecan treatment in patients with HER2-expressing metastatic colorectal cancer: biomarker analyses of DESTINY-CRC01
  4. Evaluation of immune checkpoint inhibitor efficacy for solid tumors with CD274 (PD-L1 gene) amplification identified by comprehensive genomic profiling: retrospective study based on a nationwide database
  5. Correction: Real-world effectiveness and safety of trastuzumab-deruxtecan in Japanese patients with HER2-positive advanced gastric cancer (EN-DEAVOR study)
  6. HER2-related biomarkers predict clinical outcomes with trastuzumab deruxtecan treatment in patients with HER2-expressing metastatic colorectal cancer: biomarker analyses of DESTINY-CRC01
  7. Real-world effectiveness and safety of trastuzumab-deruxtecan in Japanese patients with HER2-positive advanced gastric cancer (EN-DEAVOR study)
  8. QUATTRO-II randomized trial: CAPOXIRI+bevacizumab vs. FOLFOXIRI+bevacizumab as first-line treatment in patients with mCRC
  9. Trastuzumab deruxtecan in patients with HER2-positive advanced colorectal cancer (DESTINY-CRC02): primary results from a multicentre, randomised, phase 2 trial
  10. Lenvatinib Plus Pembrolizumab Versus Standard of Care for Previously Treated Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Final Analysis of the Randomized, Open-Label, Phase III LEAP-017 Study
  11. PD-L1 Immunohistochemistry in Gastric Cancer: Comparison of Combined Positive Score and Tumor Area Positivity Across 28-8, 22C3, and SP263 Assays
  12. Trastuzumab deruxtecan in HER2-positive advanced gastric cancer: exploratory biomarker analysis of the randomized, phase 2 DESTINY-Gastric01 trial
  13. Nivolumab plus chemotherapy or ipilimumab versus chemotherapy in patients with advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (CheckMate 648): 29‐month follow‐up from a randomized, open‐label, phase III trial
  14. New therapeutic target molecules for gastric and gastroesophageal junction cancer
  15. Data from Phase II Study of the Liposomal Formulation of Eribulin (E7389-LF) in Combination with Nivolumab: Results from the Gastric Cancer Cohort
  16. Data from Phase II Study of the Liposomal Formulation of Eribulin (E7389-LF) in Combination with Nivolumab: Results from the Gastric Cancer Cohort
  17. Supplementary Figure S1 from Phase II Study of the Liposomal Formulation of Eribulin (E7389-LF) in Combination with Nivolumab: Results from the Gastric Cancer Cohort
  18. Supplementary Figure S1 from Phase II Study of the Liposomal Formulation of Eribulin (E7389-LF) in Combination with Nivolumab: Results from the Gastric Cancer Cohort
  19. Supplementary Figure S2 from Phase II Study of the Liposomal Formulation of Eribulin (E7389-LF) in Combination with Nivolumab: Results from the Gastric Cancer Cohort
  20. Supplementary Figure S2 from Phase II Study of the Liposomal Formulation of Eribulin (E7389-LF) in Combination with Nivolumab: Results from the Gastric Cancer Cohort
  21. Supplementary Figure S3 from Phase II Study of the Liposomal Formulation of Eribulin (E7389-LF) in Combination with Nivolumab: Results from the Gastric Cancer Cohort
  22. Supplementary Figure S3 from Phase II Study of the Liposomal Formulation of Eribulin (E7389-LF) in Combination with Nivolumab: Results from the Gastric Cancer Cohort
  23. Supplementary Table S1 from Phase II Study of the Liposomal Formulation of Eribulin (E7389-LF) in Combination with Nivolumab: Results from the Gastric Cancer Cohort
  24. Supplementary Table S1 from Phase II Study of the Liposomal Formulation of Eribulin (E7389-LF) in Combination with Nivolumab: Results from the Gastric Cancer Cohort
  25. Supplementary Table S2 from Phase II Study of the Liposomal Formulation of Eribulin (E7389-LF) in Combination with Nivolumab: Results from the Gastric Cancer Cohort
  26. Supplementary Table S2 from Phase II Study of the Liposomal Formulation of Eribulin (E7389-LF) in Combination with Nivolumab: Results from the Gastric Cancer Cohort
  27. Supplementary Table S3 from Phase II Study of the Liposomal Formulation of Eribulin (E7389-LF) in Combination with Nivolumab: Results from the Gastric Cancer Cohort
  28. Supplementary Table S3 from Phase II Study of the Liposomal Formulation of Eribulin (E7389-LF) in Combination with Nivolumab: Results from the Gastric Cancer Cohort
  29. Supplementary Table S4 from Phase II Study of the Liposomal Formulation of Eribulin (E7389-LF) in Combination with Nivolumab: Results from the Gastric Cancer Cohort
  30. Supplementary Table S4 from Phase II Study of the Liposomal Formulation of Eribulin (E7389-LF) in Combination with Nivolumab: Results from the Gastric Cancer Cohort
  31. Supplementary Table S5 from Phase II Study of the Liposomal Formulation of Eribulin (E7389-LF) in Combination with Nivolumab: Results from the Gastric Cancer Cohort
  32. Supplementary Table S5 from Phase II Study of the Liposomal Formulation of Eribulin (E7389-LF) in Combination with Nivolumab: Results from the Gastric Cancer Cohort
  33. Anti-integrin αvβ6 autoantibodies are a potential biomarker for ulcerative colitis-like immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced colitis
  34. Clinical practice guidelines for esophagogastric junction cancer: Upper GI Oncology Summit 2023
  35. Pan-Asian adapted ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for the diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of patients with gastric cancer
  36. Phase II Study of the Liposomal Formulation of Eribulin (E7389-LF) in Combination with Nivolumab: Results from the Gastric Cancer Cohort
  37. Data from Phase II Study of the Liposomal Formulation of Eribulin (E7389-LF) in Combination with Nivolumab: Results from the Small Cell Lung Cancer Cohort
  38. Data from Phase II Study of the Liposomal Formulation of Eribulin (E7389-LF) in Combination with Nivolumab: Results from the Small Cell Lung Cancer Cohort
  39. FIGURE 1 from Phase II Study of the Liposomal Formulation of Eribulin (E7389-LF) in Combination with Nivolumab: Results from the Small Cell Lung Cancer Cohort
  40. FIGURE 1 from Phase II Study of the Liposomal Formulation of Eribulin (E7389-LF) in Combination with Nivolumab: Results from the Small Cell Lung Cancer Cohort
  41. FIGURE 2 from Phase II Study of the Liposomal Formulation of Eribulin (E7389-LF) in Combination with Nivolumab: Results from the Small Cell Lung Cancer Cohort
  42. FIGURE 2 from Phase II Study of the Liposomal Formulation of Eribulin (E7389-LF) in Combination with Nivolumab: Results from the Small Cell Lung Cancer Cohort
  43. FIGURE 3 from Phase II Study of the Liposomal Formulation of Eribulin (E7389-LF) in Combination with Nivolumab: Results from the Small Cell Lung Cancer Cohort
  44. FIGURE 3 from Phase II Study of the Liposomal Formulation of Eribulin (E7389-LF) in Combination with Nivolumab: Results from the Small Cell Lung Cancer Cohort
  45. FIGURE 4 from Phase II Study of the Liposomal Formulation of Eribulin (E7389-LF) in Combination with Nivolumab: Results from the Small Cell Lung Cancer Cohort
  46. FIGURE 4 from Phase II Study of the Liposomal Formulation of Eribulin (E7389-LF) in Combination with Nivolumab: Results from the Small Cell Lung Cancer Cohort
  47. Supplemental Figure 1 from Phase II Study of the Liposomal Formulation of Eribulin (E7389-LF) in Combination with Nivolumab: Results from the Small Cell Lung Cancer Cohort
  48. Supplemental Figure 1 from Phase II Study of the Liposomal Formulation of Eribulin (E7389-LF) in Combination with Nivolumab: Results from the Small Cell Lung Cancer Cohort
  49. Supplemental Figure 2 from Phase II Study of the Liposomal Formulation of Eribulin (E7389-LF) in Combination with Nivolumab: Results from the Small Cell Lung Cancer Cohort
  50. Supplemental Figure 2 from Phase II Study of the Liposomal Formulation of Eribulin (E7389-LF) in Combination with Nivolumab: Results from the Small Cell Lung Cancer Cohort
  51. Supplemental Figure 3 from Phase II Study of the Liposomal Formulation of Eribulin (E7389-LF) in Combination with Nivolumab: Results from the Small Cell Lung Cancer Cohort
  52. Supplemental Figure 3 from Phase II Study of the Liposomal Formulation of Eribulin (E7389-LF) in Combination with Nivolumab: Results from the Small Cell Lung Cancer Cohort
  53. Supplemental Figure 4 from Phase II Study of the Liposomal Formulation of Eribulin (E7389-LF) in Combination with Nivolumab: Results from the Small Cell Lung Cancer Cohort
  54. Supplemental Figure 4 from Phase II Study of the Liposomal Formulation of Eribulin (E7389-LF) in Combination with Nivolumab: Results from the Small Cell Lung Cancer Cohort
  55. Supplemental Methods from Phase II Study of the Liposomal Formulation of Eribulin (E7389-LF) in Combination with Nivolumab: Results from the Small Cell Lung Cancer Cohort
  56. Supplemental Methods from Phase II Study of the Liposomal Formulation of Eribulin (E7389-LF) in Combination with Nivolumab: Results from the Small Cell Lung Cancer Cohort
  57. Supplemental Table 1 from Phase II Study of the Liposomal Formulation of Eribulin (E7389-LF) in Combination with Nivolumab: Results from the Small Cell Lung Cancer Cohort
  58. Supplemental Table 1 from Phase II Study of the Liposomal Formulation of Eribulin (E7389-LF) in Combination with Nivolumab: Results from the Small Cell Lung Cancer Cohort
  59. Supplemental Table 2 from Phase II Study of the Liposomal Formulation of Eribulin (E7389-LF) in Combination with Nivolumab: Results from the Small Cell Lung Cancer Cohort
  60. Supplemental Table 2 from Phase II Study of the Liposomal Formulation of Eribulin (E7389-LF) in Combination with Nivolumab: Results from the Small Cell Lung Cancer Cohort
  61. Supplemental Table 3 from Phase II Study of the Liposomal Formulation of Eribulin (E7389-LF) in Combination with Nivolumab: Results from the Small Cell Lung Cancer Cohort
  62. Supplemental Table 3 from Phase II Study of the Liposomal Formulation of Eribulin (E7389-LF) in Combination with Nivolumab: Results from the Small Cell Lung Cancer Cohort
  63. Supplemental Table 4 from Phase II Study of the Liposomal Formulation of Eribulin (E7389-LF) in Combination with Nivolumab: Results from the Small Cell Lung Cancer Cohort
  64. Supplemental Table 4 from Phase II Study of the Liposomal Formulation of Eribulin (E7389-LF) in Combination with Nivolumab: Results from the Small Cell Lung Cancer Cohort
  65. Supplemental Table 5 from Phase II Study of the Liposomal Formulation of Eribulin (E7389-LF) in Combination with Nivolumab: Results from the Small Cell Lung Cancer Cohort
  66. Supplemental Table 5 from Phase II Study of the Liposomal Formulation of Eribulin (E7389-LF) in Combination with Nivolumab: Results from the Small Cell Lung Cancer Cohort
  67. TABLE 1 from Phase II Study of the Liposomal Formulation of Eribulin (E7389-LF) in Combination with Nivolumab: Results from the Small Cell Lung Cancer Cohort
  68. TABLE 1 from Phase II Study of the Liposomal Formulation of Eribulin (E7389-LF) in Combination with Nivolumab: Results from the Small Cell Lung Cancer Cohort
  69. TABLE 2 from Phase II Study of the Liposomal Formulation of Eribulin (E7389-LF) in Combination with Nivolumab: Results from the Small Cell Lung Cancer Cohort
  70. TABLE 2 from Phase II Study of the Liposomal Formulation of Eribulin (E7389-LF) in Combination with Nivolumab: Results from the Small Cell Lung Cancer Cohort
  71. Phase II Study of the Liposomal Formulation of Eribulin (E7389-LF) in Combination with Nivolumab: Results from the Small Cell Lung Cancer Cohort
  72. Phase II study of S-1 plus docetaxel as first-line treatment for older patients with advanced gastric cancer (OGSG 0902)
  73. Exploratory Biomarker Analysis Using Plasma Angiogenesis-Related Factors and Cell-Free DNA in the TRUSTY Study: A Randomized, Phase II/III Study of Trifluridine/Tipiracil Plus Bevacizumab as Second-Line Treatment for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
  74. The combination of soluble forms of PD-1 and PD-L1 as a predictive marker of PD-1 blockade in patients with advanced cancers: a multicenter retrospective study
  75. Predictive and prognostic value of excision repair cross-complementing group 1 by multi-omics on the outcomes in patients with advanced gastric cancer
  76. Trifluridine/Tipiracil Plus Bevacizumab for Vulnerable Patients With Pretreated Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Retrospective Study (WJOG14520G)
  77. Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy versus placebo plus chemotherapy for HER2-negative advanced gastric cancer (KEYNOTE-859): a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, phase 3 trial
  78. Real-World Treatment Sequencing in Vulnerable Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Multicenter Retrospective Study
  79. Data from HER3 Augmentation via Blockade of EGFR/AKT Signaling Enhances Anticancer Activity of HER3-Targeting Patritumab Deruxtecan in EGFR-Mutated Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer
  80. Data from HER3 Augmentation via Blockade of EGFR/AKT Signaling Enhances Anticancer Activity of HER3-Targeting Patritumab Deruxtecan in EGFR-Mutated Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer
  81. Figure S1 from HER3 Augmentation via Blockade of EGFR/AKT Signaling Enhances Anticancer Activity of HER3-Targeting Patritumab Deruxtecan in EGFR-Mutated Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer
  82. Figure S1 from HER3 Augmentation via Blockade of EGFR/AKT Signaling Enhances Anticancer Activity of HER3-Targeting Patritumab Deruxtecan in EGFR-Mutated Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer
  83. Figure S2 from HER3 Augmentation via Blockade of EGFR/AKT Signaling Enhances Anticancer Activity of HER3-Targeting Patritumab Deruxtecan in EGFR-Mutated Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer
  84. Figure S2 from HER3 Augmentation via Blockade of EGFR/AKT Signaling Enhances Anticancer Activity of HER3-Targeting Patritumab Deruxtecan in EGFR-Mutated Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer
  85. Figure S3 from HER3 Augmentation via Blockade of EGFR/AKT Signaling Enhances Anticancer Activity of HER3-Targeting Patritumab Deruxtecan in EGFR-Mutated Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer
  86. Figure S3 from HER3 Augmentation via Blockade of EGFR/AKT Signaling Enhances Anticancer Activity of HER3-Targeting Patritumab Deruxtecan in EGFR-Mutated Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer
  87. Figure S4 from HER3 Augmentation via Blockade of EGFR/AKT Signaling Enhances Anticancer Activity of HER3-Targeting Patritumab Deruxtecan in EGFR-Mutated Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer
  88. Figure S4 from HER3 Augmentation via Blockade of EGFR/AKT Signaling Enhances Anticancer Activity of HER3-Targeting Patritumab Deruxtecan in EGFR-Mutated Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer
  89. Figure S5 from HER3 Augmentation via Blockade of EGFR/AKT Signaling Enhances Anticancer Activity of HER3-Targeting Patritumab Deruxtecan in EGFR-Mutated Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer
  90. Figure S5 from HER3 Augmentation via Blockade of EGFR/AKT Signaling Enhances Anticancer Activity of HER3-Targeting Patritumab Deruxtecan in EGFR-Mutated Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer
  91. Figure S6 from HER3 Augmentation via Blockade of EGFR/AKT Signaling Enhances Anticancer Activity of HER3-Targeting Patritumab Deruxtecan in EGFR-Mutated Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer
  92. Figure S6 from HER3 Augmentation via Blockade of EGFR/AKT Signaling Enhances Anticancer Activity of HER3-Targeting Patritumab Deruxtecan in EGFR-Mutated Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer
  93. Figure S7 from HER3 Augmentation via Blockade of EGFR/AKT Signaling Enhances Anticancer Activity of HER3-Targeting Patritumab Deruxtecan in EGFR-Mutated Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer
  94. Figure S7 from HER3 Augmentation via Blockade of EGFR/AKT Signaling Enhances Anticancer Activity of HER3-Targeting Patritumab Deruxtecan in EGFR-Mutated Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer
  95. Figure S8 from HER3 Augmentation via Blockade of EGFR/AKT Signaling Enhances Anticancer Activity of HER3-Targeting Patritumab Deruxtecan in EGFR-Mutated Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer
  96. Figure S8 from HER3 Augmentation via Blockade of EGFR/AKT Signaling Enhances Anticancer Activity of HER3-Targeting Patritumab Deruxtecan in EGFR-Mutated Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer
  97. Table S1 from HER3 Augmentation via Blockade of EGFR/AKT Signaling Enhances Anticancer Activity of HER3-Targeting Patritumab Deruxtecan in EGFR-Mutated Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer
  98. Table S1 from HER3 Augmentation via Blockade of EGFR/AKT Signaling Enhances Anticancer Activity of HER3-Targeting Patritumab Deruxtecan in EGFR-Mutated Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer
  99. Table S2 from HER3 Augmentation via Blockade of EGFR/AKT Signaling Enhances Anticancer Activity of HER3-Targeting Patritumab Deruxtecan in EGFR-Mutated Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer
  100. Table S2 from HER3 Augmentation via Blockade of EGFR/AKT Signaling Enhances Anticancer Activity of HER3-Targeting Patritumab Deruxtecan in EGFR-Mutated Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer
  101. Table S3 from HER3 Augmentation via Blockade of EGFR/AKT Signaling Enhances Anticancer Activity of HER3-Targeting Patritumab Deruxtecan in EGFR-Mutated Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer
  102. Table S3 from HER3 Augmentation via Blockade of EGFR/AKT Signaling Enhances Anticancer Activity of HER3-Targeting Patritumab Deruxtecan in EGFR-Mutated Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer
  103. Role of plasma angiogenesis factors in the efficacy of first‐line chemotherapy combined with biologics in RAS wild‐type metastatic colorectal cancer: Results from the GI‐SCREEN CRC‐Ukit study
  104. Meta-analysis of three randomized trials of capecitabine plus cisplatin (XP) versus S-1 plus cisplatin (SP) as first-line treatment for advanced gastric cancer
  105. Randomised phase II trial of trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) plus ramucirumab (RAM) versus trifluridine/tipiracil for previously treated patients with advanced gastric or esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma (RETRIEVE study, WJOG15822G)
  106. Mutational spectrum of TP53 gene correlates with nivolumab treatment efficacy in advanced gastric cancer (TP53MUT study)
  107. Phase I dose-escalation study on irinotecan, cisplatin, and S-1 combination in chemotherapy-naïve patients with HER2-negative advanced gastric cancer (HERBIS-4B, OGSG 1106)
  108. Survival impact of microsatellite instability in stage II gastric cancer patients who received S-1 adjuvant monotherapy after curative resection
  109. Effect of the number of cycles of docetaxel + S-1 therapy on long-term survival in adjuvant chemotherapy for stage III gastric cancer. A pooled analysis of the OGSG0604 and OGSG1002 trials
  110. Final results of DESTINY-CRC01 investigating trastuzumab deruxtecan in patients with HER2-expressing metastatic colorectal cancer
  111. Efficacy and safety of maintenance therapy with pamiparib versus placebo for advanced gastric cancer responding to first‐line platinum‐based chemotherapy: Phase 2 study results
  112. Randomised Phase II Trial of Trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) plus Ramucirumab (RAM) versus Trifluridine/tipiracil for Previously treated Patients with Advanced Gastric or Esophagogastric Junction Adenocarcinoma (RETRIEVE study, WJOG15822G)
  113. Soluble programmed cell death ligand 1 predicts prognosis for gastric cancer patients treated with nivolumab: Blood-based biomarker analysis for the DELIVER trial
  114. A Phase II Trial of Trifluridine/Tipiracil in Combination with Cetuximab Rechallenge in Patients with RAS Wild-Type mCRC Refractory to Prior Anti-EGFR Antibodies: WJOG8916G Trial
  115. Efficacy of Pembrolizumab Monotherapy in Japanese Patients with Advanced Gastric or Gastroesophageal Junction Cancer
  116. The potential clinical utility of cell-free DNA for gastric cancer patients treated with nivolumab monotherapy
  117. Data from HER3 Augmentation via Blockade of EGFR/AKT Signaling Enhances Anticancer Activity of HER3-Targeting Patritumab Deruxtecan in EGFR-Mutated Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer
  118. Data from KRAS Inhibitor Resistance in <i>MET</i>-Amplified <i>KRAS</i><sup>G12C</sup> Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer Induced By RAS- and Non–RAS-Mediated Cell Signaling Mechanisms
  119. Data from KRAS Inhibitor Resistance in <i>MET</i>-Amplified <i>KRAS</i><sup>G12C</sup> Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer Induced By RAS- and Non–RAS-Mediated Cell Signaling Mechanisms
  120. Supplementary Data from KRAS Inhibitor Resistance in <i>MET</i>-Amplified <i>KRAS</i><sup>G12C</sup> Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer Induced By RAS- and Non–RAS-Mediated Cell Signaling Mechanisms
  121. Supplementary Data from KRAS Inhibitor Resistance in <i>MET</i>-Amplified <i>KRAS</i><sup>G12C</sup> Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer Induced By RAS- and Non–RAS-Mediated Cell Signaling Mechanisms
  122. Supplementary Data from KRAS Inhibitor Resistance in <i>MET</i>-Amplified <i>KRAS</i><sup>G12C</sup> Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer Induced By RAS- and Non–RAS-Mediated Cell Signaling Mechanisms
  123. Supplementary Data from KRAS Inhibitor Resistance in <i>MET</i>-Amplified <i>KRAS</i><sup>G12C</sup> Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer Induced By RAS- and Non–RAS-Mediated Cell Signaling Mechanisms
  124. Supplementary Data from KRAS Inhibitor Resistance in <i>MET</i>-Amplified <i>KRAS</i><sup>G12C</sup> Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer Induced By RAS- and Non–RAS-Mediated Cell Signaling Mechanisms
  125. Supplementary Data from KRAS Inhibitor Resistance in <i>MET</i>-Amplified <i>KRAS</i><sup>G12C</sup> Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer Induced By RAS- and Non–RAS-Mediated Cell Signaling Mechanisms
  126. Supplementary Data from KRAS Inhibitor Resistance in <i>MET</i>-Amplified <i>KRAS</i><sup>G12C</sup> Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer Induced By RAS- and Non–RAS-Mediated Cell Signaling Mechanisms
  127. Supplementary Data from KRAS Inhibitor Resistance in <i>MET</i>-Amplified <i>KRAS</i><sup>G12C</sup> Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer Induced By RAS- and Non–RAS-Mediated Cell Signaling Mechanisms
  128. Supplementary Data from KRAS Inhibitor Resistance in <i>MET</i>-Amplified <i>KRAS</i><sup>G12C</sup> Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer Induced By RAS- and Non–RAS-Mediated Cell Signaling Mechanisms
  129. Supplementary Data from KRAS Inhibitor Resistance in <i>MET</i>-Amplified <i>KRAS</i><sup>G12C</sup> Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer Induced By RAS- and Non–RAS-Mediated Cell Signaling Mechanisms
  130. Supplementary Data from KRAS Inhibitor Resistance in <i>MET</i>-Amplified <i>KRAS</i><sup>G12C</sup> Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer Induced By RAS- and Non–RAS-Mediated Cell Signaling Mechanisms
  131. Supplementary Data from KRAS Inhibitor Resistance in <i>MET</i>-Amplified <i>KRAS</i><sup>G12C</sup> Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer Induced By RAS- and Non–RAS-Mediated Cell Signaling Mechanisms
  132. Supplementary Data from KRAS Inhibitor Resistance in <i>MET</i>-Amplified <i>KRAS</i><sup>G12C</sup> Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer Induced By RAS- and Non–RAS-Mediated Cell Signaling Mechanisms
  133. Supplementary Data from KRAS Inhibitor Resistance in <i>MET</i>-Amplified <i>KRAS</i><sup>G12C</sup> Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer Induced By RAS- and Non–RAS-Mediated Cell Signaling Mechanisms
  134. Supplementary Data from KRAS Inhibitor Resistance in <i>MET</i>-Amplified <i>KRAS</i><sup>G12C</sup> Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer Induced By RAS- and Non–RAS-Mediated Cell Signaling Mechanisms
  135. Supplementary Data from KRAS Inhibitor Resistance in <i>MET</i>-Amplified <i>KRAS</i><sup>G12C</sup> Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer Induced By RAS- and Non–RAS-Mediated Cell Signaling Mechanisms
  136. Supplementary Figure from HER3 Augmentation via Blockade of EGFR/AKT Signaling Enhances Anticancer Activity of HER3-Targeting Patritumab Deruxtecan in EGFR-Mutated Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer
  137. Supplementary Figure from HER3 Augmentation via Blockade of EGFR/AKT Signaling Enhances Anticancer Activity of HER3-Targeting Patritumab Deruxtecan in EGFR-Mutated Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer
  138. Supplementary Figure from HER3 Augmentation via Blockade of EGFR/AKT Signaling Enhances Anticancer Activity of HER3-Targeting Patritumab Deruxtecan in EGFR-Mutated Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer
  139. Supplementary Figure from HER3 Augmentation via Blockade of EGFR/AKT Signaling Enhances Anticancer Activity of HER3-Targeting Patritumab Deruxtecan in EGFR-Mutated Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer
  140. Supplementary Figure from HER3 Augmentation via Blockade of EGFR/AKT Signaling Enhances Anticancer Activity of HER3-Targeting Patritumab Deruxtecan in EGFR-Mutated Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer
  141. Supplementary Figure from HER3 Augmentation via Blockade of EGFR/AKT Signaling Enhances Anticancer Activity of HER3-Targeting Patritumab Deruxtecan in EGFR-Mutated Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer
  142. Supplementary Figure from HER3 Augmentation via Blockade of EGFR/AKT Signaling Enhances Anticancer Activity of HER3-Targeting Patritumab Deruxtecan in EGFR-Mutated Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer
  143. Supplementary Figure from HER3 Augmentation via Blockade of EGFR/AKT Signaling Enhances Anticancer Activity of HER3-Targeting Patritumab Deruxtecan in EGFR-Mutated Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer
  144. Supplementary Figure from HER3 Augmentation via Blockade of EGFR/AKT Signaling Enhances Anticancer Activity of HER3-Targeting Patritumab Deruxtecan in EGFR-Mutated Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer
  145. Supplementary Figure from HER3 Augmentation via Blockade of EGFR/AKT Signaling Enhances Anticancer Activity of HER3-Targeting Patritumab Deruxtecan in EGFR-Mutated Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer
  146. Supplementary Figure from HER3 Augmentation via Blockade of EGFR/AKT Signaling Enhances Anticancer Activity of HER3-Targeting Patritumab Deruxtecan in EGFR-Mutated Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer
  147. Supplementary Figure from HER3 Augmentation via Blockade of EGFR/AKT Signaling Enhances Anticancer Activity of HER3-Targeting Patritumab Deruxtecan in EGFR-Mutated Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer
  148. Supplementary Figure from HER3 Augmentation via Blockade of EGFR/AKT Signaling Enhances Anticancer Activity of HER3-Targeting Patritumab Deruxtecan in EGFR-Mutated Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer
  149. Supplementary Figure from HER3 Augmentation via Blockade of EGFR/AKT Signaling Enhances Anticancer Activity of HER3-Targeting Patritumab Deruxtecan in EGFR-Mutated Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer
  150. Supplementary Figure from HER3 Augmentation via Blockade of EGFR/AKT Signaling Enhances Anticancer Activity of HER3-Targeting Patritumab Deruxtecan in EGFR-Mutated Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer
  151. Supplementary Figure from HER3 Augmentation via Blockade of EGFR/AKT Signaling Enhances Anticancer Activity of HER3-Targeting Patritumab Deruxtecan in EGFR-Mutated Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer
  152. Supplementary Table from HER3 Augmentation via Blockade of EGFR/AKT Signaling Enhances Anticancer Activity of HER3-Targeting Patritumab Deruxtecan in EGFR-Mutated Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer
  153. Supplementary Table from HER3 Augmentation via Blockade of EGFR/AKT Signaling Enhances Anticancer Activity of HER3-Targeting Patritumab Deruxtecan in EGFR-Mutated Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer
  154. Supplementary Table from HER3 Augmentation via Blockade of EGFR/AKT Signaling Enhances Anticancer Activity of HER3-Targeting Patritumab Deruxtecan in EGFR-Mutated Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer
  155. Supplementary Table from HER3 Augmentation via Blockade of EGFR/AKT Signaling Enhances Anticancer Activity of HER3-Targeting Patritumab Deruxtecan in EGFR-Mutated Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer
  156. Supplementary Table from HER3 Augmentation via Blockade of EGFR/AKT Signaling Enhances Anticancer Activity of HER3-Targeting Patritumab Deruxtecan in EGFR-Mutated Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer
  157. Supplementary Table from HER3 Augmentation via Blockade of EGFR/AKT Signaling Enhances Anticancer Activity of HER3-Targeting Patritumab Deruxtecan in EGFR-Mutated Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer
  158. Trifluridine/tipiracil+bevacizumab (BEV) vs. fluoropyrimidine-irinotecan+BEV as second-line therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer: a randomised noninferiority trial
  159. Trastuzumab Deruxtecan in Anti–Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Treatment–Naive Patients With Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2–Low Gastric or Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma: Exploratory Cohort Results in a Phase II Trial
  160. The potential clinical utility of cell-free DNA for gastric cancer patients treated with nivolumab monotherapy
  161. Correction: Implication of changes in PD-L1 expression during neoadjuvant chemotherapy with docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil (DCF) regimen in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma
  162. Implication of changes in PD-L1 expression during neoadjuvant chemotherapy with docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil (DCF) regimen in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma
  163. TRESBIEN (OGSG 2101): encorafenib, binimetinib and cetuximab for early recurrent stage II/III BRAF V600E-mutated colorectal cancer
  164. Mechanisms of primary and acquired resistance to immune checkpoint inhibitors in advanced non–small cell lung cancer: A multiplex immunohistochemistry–based single-cell analysis
  165. First-line nivolumab plus ipilimumab or chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone in advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a Japanese subgroup analysis of open-label, phase 3 trial (CheckMate 648/ONO-4538-50)
  166. Histology Classification Highlights Differences in Efficacy of S-1 versus Capecitabine, in Combination with Cisplatin, for HER2-Negative Unresectable Advanced or Recurrent Gastric Cancer with Measurable Disease
  167. Oral formulation of bendamustine hydrochloride for patients with advanced solid tumors; a phase 1 study
  168. Contribution of MMP14-expressing cancer-associated fibroblasts in the tumor immune microenvironment to progression of colorectal cancer
  169. The Phase II Study of Panitumumab in Chemotherapy-Naïve Frail or Elderly Patients with RAS Wild-type Colorectal Cancer: OGSG 1602 Final Results
  170. Neoadjuvant docetaxel, oxaliplatin and S-1 therapy for the patients with large type 3 or type 4 gastric cancer (OGSG1902): protocol of a multi-center, phase II study
  171. Protocol of OGSG 1901: a phase II trial of ramucirumab plus irinotecan for patients with early relapsed gastric cancer during or after adjuvant docetaxel plus S − 1 therapy
  172. Phase IIb study of pembrolizumab combined with S‐1 + oxaliplatin or S‐1 + cisplatin as first‐line chemotherapy for gastric cancer
  173. A phase II study of S-1 therapy for patients with advanced and recurrent esophageal cancer resistant or intolerable to fluorouracil, platinum, and taxane therapy (OGSG 1404)
  174. NOTCH gene alterations in metastatic colorectal cancer in the Nationwide Cancer Genome Screening Project in Japan (SCRUM-Japan GI-SCREEN)
  175. Three-Year Outcomes of a Phase II Study of Perioperative Capecitabine Plus Oxaliplatin Therapy for Clinical SS/SE N1-3 M0 Gastric Cancer (OGSG 1601)
  176. NOTCH gene alterations in metastatic colorectal cancer in the Nationwide Cancer Genome Screening Project in Japan (SCRUM-Japan GI-SCREEN)
  177. Sequential treatment strategy using fluoropyrimidine plus bevacizumab followed by oxaliplatin for metastatic colorectal cancer: A phase II study (OGSG 1107)
  178. Nivolumab Combination Therapy in Advanced Esophageal Squamous-Cell Carcinoma
  179. Correction: KRAS Inhibitor Resistance in MET-Amplified KRASG12C Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer Induced By RAS- and Non–RAS-Mediated Cell Signaling Mechanisms
  180. HER3 Augmentation via Blockade of EGFR/AKT Signaling Enhances Anticancer Activity of HER3-Targeting Patritumab Deruxtecan in EGFR-Mutated Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer
  181. Second-line pembrolizumab versus chemotherapy in Japanese patients with advanced esophageal cancer: subgroup analysis from KEYNOTE-181
  182. Randomized phase II study of docetaxel versus paclitaxel in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma refractory to fluoropyrimidine- and platinum-based chemotherapy: OGSG1201
  183. Randomized phase II study of CPT-11 versus PTX versus each combination chemotherapy with S-1 for advanced gastric cancer that is refractory to S-1 or S-1 plus CDDP: OGSG0701
  184. Real-world effectiveness of nivolumab in advanced gastric cancer: the DELIVER trial (JACCRO GC-08)
  185. KRAS Inhibitor Resistance in MET-Amplified KRASG12C Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer Induced By RAS- and Non–RAS-Mediated Cell Signaling Mechanisms
  186. Integrative analysis of gut microbiome and host transcriptomes reveals associations between treatment outcomes and immunotherapy‐induced colitis
  187. Effects of an oral elemental nutritional supplement in gastric cancer patients with adjuvant S‐1 chemotherapy after gastrectomy: A multicenter, open‐label, single‐arm, prospective phase II study (OGSG1108)
  188. Serum lactate dehydrogenase is a predictive biomarker in patients with oropharyngeal cancer undergoing radiotherapy: Retrospective study on predictive factors
  189. Folate receptor α increases chemotherapy resistance through stabilizing MDM2 in cooperation with PHB2 that is overcome by MORAb‐202 in gastric cancer
  190. Trastuzumab deruxtecan (DS-8201) in patients with HER2-expressing metastatic colorectal cancer (DESTINY-CRC01): a multicentre, open-label, phase 2 trial
  191. An Investigator-Initiated Phase 2 Study of Nivolumab Plus Low-Dose Ipilimumab as First-Line Therapy for Microsatellite Instability—High Advanced Gastric or Esophagogastric Junction Cancer (NO LIMIT, WJOG13320G/CA209-7W7)
  192. Clinical Application of the FoundationOne CDx Assay to Therapeutic Decision-Making for Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors
  193. Efficacy of Combination Chemotherapy Using a Novel Oral Chemotherapeutic Agent, FTD/TPI, with Ramucirumab Murine Version DC101 in a Mouse Syngeneic Cancer Transplantation Model
  194. Clinical practice guidelines for the management of liver metastases from extrahepatic primary cancers 2021
  195. Nintedanib promotes antitumour immunity and shows antitumour activity in combination with PD-1 blockade in mice: potential role of cancer-associated fibroblasts
  196. FMS‐like tyrosine kinase 3 ( FLT3 ) amplification in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer
  197. Nivolumab versus chemotherapy in Japanese patients with advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a subgroup analysis of a multicenter, randomized, open-label, phase 3 trial (ATTRACTION-3)
  198. Clinical utility of circulating tumor DNA sequencing in advanced gastrointestinal cancer: SCRUM-Japan GI-SCREEN and GOZILA studies
  199. Phase II Study of Panitumumab Monotherapy in Chemotherapy-Naïve Frail or Elderly Patients with Unresectable RAS Wild-Type Colorectal Cancer: OGSG 1602
  200. Revive Study: a Prospective Observational Study in Chemotherapy After Nivolumab Therapy for Advanced Gastric Cancer
  201. A phase II trial of dose-reduced nab-paclitaxel for patients with previously treated, advanced or recurrent gastric cancer (OGSG 1302)
  202. Docetaxel plus S-1 versus cisplatin plus S-1 in unresectable gastric cancer without measurable lesions: a randomized phase II trial (HERBIS-3)
  203. A Case of Pulmonary Tumor Thrombotic Microangiopathy Suggested by the Presence of Tumor Cells in Peripheral Blood
  204. Trastuzumab Deruxtecan in Previously Treated HER2-Positive Gastric Cancer
  205. Comparison of S-1–cisplatin every 5 weeks with capecitabine-cisplatin every 3 weeks for HER2-negative gastric cancer (recurrent after S-1 adjuvant therapy or chemotherapy-naïve advanced): pooled analysis of HERBIS-2 (OGSG 1103) and HERBIS-4A (OGSG 1105...
  206. Safety and efficacy of pembrolizumab in combination with S-1 plus oxaliplatin as a first-line treatment in patients with advanced gastric/gastroesophageal junction cancer: Cohort 1 data from the KEYNOTE-659 phase IIb study
  207. Phase II study of 5-fluorouracil–leucovorin plus bevacizumab for chemotherapy-naïve older or frail patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (OGSG 0802)
  208. Emerging Targeted Therapies for HER2 Positive Gastric Cancer That Can Overcome Trastuzumab Resistance
  209. Glasgow Prognostic Score (GPS) and Tumor Response as Biomarkers of Nivolumab Monotherapy in Third- or Later-line Setting for Advanced Gastric Cancer
  210. U3-1402 sensitizes HER3-expressing tumors to PD-1 blockade by immune activation
  211. Aberrant HER3 ligand heregulin-expressing head and neck squamous cell carcinoma is resistant to anti-EGFR antibody cetuximab, but not second-generation EGFR-TKI
  212. A Phase II Study of Perioperative Capecitabine plus Oxaliplatin Therapy for Clinical SS/SE N1-3 M0 Gastric Cancer (OGSG 1601)
  213. Clinical and immune profiling for cancer of unknown primary site
  214. A comparative study of curated contents by knowledge-based curation system in cancer clinical sequencing
  215. DELIVER (JACCRO GC-08) Trial: Discover Novel Host-Related Immune-Biomarkers for Nivolumab in Advanced Gastric Cancer
  216. [fam‐] trastuzumab deruxtecan, antitumor activity is dependent on HER2 expression level rather than on HER2 amplification
  217. Targeting of the HER2/HER3 signaling axis overcomes ligand‐mediated resistance to trastuzumab in HER2‐positive breast cancer
  218. Pan-Asian adapted ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for the management of patients with metastatic gastric cancer: a JSMO–ESMO initiative endorsed by CSCO, KSMO, MOS, SSO and TOS
  219. Pan-Asian adapted ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for the management of patients with metastatic oesophageal cancer: a JSMO–ESMO initiative endorsed by CSCO, KSMO, MOS, SSO and TOS
  220. Nivolumab-Induced Hemophilia A Presenting as Gastric Ulcer Bleeding in a Patient With NSCLC
  221. Mutational activation of the epidermal growth factor receptor down‐regulates major histocompatibility complex class I expression via the extracellular signal‐regulated kinase in non–small cell lung cancer
  222. Phase II Trial of 5-Fluorouracil, Docetaxel, and Nedaplatin (UDON) Combination Therapy for Recurrent or Metastatic Esophageal Cancer
  223. An HER3-targeting antibody–drug conjugate incorporating a DNA topoisomerase I inhibitor U3-1402 conquers EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor-resistant NSCLC
  224. Randomized, Open‐Label Phase II Study Comparing Capecitabine‐Cisplatin Every 3 Weeks with S‐1‐Cisplatin Every 5 Weeks in Chemotherapy‐Naïve Patients with HER2‐Negative Advanced Gastric Cancer: OGSG1105, HERBIS‐4A Trial
  225. Nivolumab-induced acute granulomatous tubulointerstitial nephritis in a patient with gastric cancer
  226. Targeting CDK1 and MEK/ERK Overcomes Apoptotic Resistance in BRAF-Mutant Human Colorectal Cancer
  227. Two-step Intensity-modulated Radiation Therapy for Oropharyngeal Cancer: Initial Clinical Experience and Validation of Clinical Staging
  228. T790M-Selective EGFR-TKI Combined with Dasatinib as an Optimal Strategy for Overcoming EGFR-TKI Resistance in T790M-Positive Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer
  229. Abstract 2173: Targeting CDK1 and MEK/ERK overcome mutant BRAF-mediated apoptosis resistance in human colorectal cancer cells
  230. Clinical evaluation of palliative chemoradiotherapy for metastatic esophageal cancer
  231. Imaging and clinicopathological features of nivolumab-related cholangitis in patients with non-small cell lung cancer
  232. Mutant BRAF Upregulates MCL-1 to Confer Apoptosis Resistance that Is Reversed by MCL-1 Antagonism and Cobimetinib in Colorectal Cancer
  233. Heregulin-expressing HER2-positive breast and gastric cancer exhibited heterogeneous susceptibility to the anti-HER2 agents lapatinib, trastuzumab and T-DM1
  234. HER3 and its Ligand, Heregulin, as Targets for Cancer Therapy
  235. Molecular Biomarkers in the Personalized Treatment of Colorectal Cancer
  236. Sa1808 Mutant BRAF (V600E) Phosphorylates MCL-1 to Increase Stability/Expression That Confers Apoptosis Resistance in Colorectal Cancer Cells
  237. Phase 1 study of pembrolizumab (MK-3475; anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibody) in Japanese patients with advanced solid tumors
  238. MET-targeted therapy for gastric cancer: the importance of a biomarker-based strategy
  239. The Mutant KRAS Gene Up-regulates BCL-XL Protein via STAT3 to Confer Apoptosis Resistance That Is Reversed by BIM Protein Induction and BCL-XL Antagonism
  240. Phase I trial of 5-FU, docetaxel, and nedaplatin (UDON) combination therapy for recurrent or metastatic esophageal cancer
  241. Microsatellite Instability Testing and Its Role in the Management of Colorectal Cancer
  242. Anti-HER3 monoclonal antibody patritumab sensitizes refractory non-small cell lung cancer to the epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor erlotinib
  243. 49 Reversal of Mutant KRAS-Mediated Apoptosis Resistance by Concurrent Bcl-xL Antagonism and Induction of Pro-Apoptotic BH3-Only Proteins in Colorectal Carcinoma Cells
  244. Reversal of Mutant KRAS-Mediated Apoptosis Resistance by Concurrent Noxa/Bik Induction and Bcl-2/Bcl-xL Antagonism in Colon Cancer Cells
  245. A phase I dose-escalation study of eribulin and S-1 for metastatic breast cancer
  246. The anti-HER3 antibody patritumab abrogates cetuximab resistance mediated by heregulin in colorectal cancer cells
  247. Targeting MET Amplification as a New Oncogenic Driver
  248. Risk Factors for Cisplatin-Induced Nephrotoxicity and Potential of Magnesium Supplementation for Renal Protection
  249. Inhibition of EGFR, HER2 and HER3 signaling with AZD8931 alone and in combination with paclitaxel: Phase I study in Japanese patients with advanced solid malignancies and advanced breast cancer
  250. Human papillomavirus DNA and p16 expression in J apanese patients with oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma
  251. Postprogression survival for first-line chemotherapy in patients with advanced gastric cancer
  252. Abstract 4657: MET amplification as a potential therapeutic target in gastric cancer.
  253. MET amplification as a potential therapeutic target in gastric cancer
  254. Phase I trial of OTS11101, an anti‐angiogenic vaccine targeting vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 1 in solid tumor
  255. Clinical outcome for EML4-ALK-positive patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer treated with first-line platinum-based chemotherapy
  256. Human Epidermal Growth Factor Eyedrops for Cetuximab-Related Filamentary Keratitis
  257. Assessment of therapeutic effects of transcatheter arterial infusion chemotherapy and transcatheter arterial chemoembolization on hepatocellular carcinoma by Sonazoid®-enhanced ultrasonography
  258. Evaluation of therapeutic response using Sonazoid®-enhanced ultrasonography after radiofrequency ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma: Comparison with dynamic CT
  259. Proposal of the radicality grading as a criterion for therapeutic effectiveness of RFA against hepatocellular carcinoma, in relation to the local recurrence rate
  260. Lemierre's Syndrome with Acute Renal Failure
  261. Corona enhancement may emerge via sinusoidal drainage pathways
  262. A case of an FNH-like hyperplastic nodule presenting ring enhancement in a peritumoral spared area on single level dynamic CT during hepatic arteriography