All Stories

  1. When is Nothing Something? Editorial for the Null Results Special Issue of Journal of Business and Psychology
  2. Why do employees worry about their jobs? A meta-analytic review of predictors of job insecurity.
  3. REVISITING THE FILE DRAWER PROBLEM IN META‐ANALYSIS: AN ASSESSMENT OF PUBLISHED AND NONPUBLISHED CORRELATION MATRICES
  4. Role of workplace romance policies and procedures on job pursuit intentions
  5. Antecedents of Job Insecurity: A Meta-Analytic Review
  6. Implicit and Explicit Attitudes as Predictors of Sexually Harassing Behavior
  7. Meta-Analytic Review of Employee Turnover as a Predictor of Firm Performance
  8. Why Do Fools Fall in Love (at Work)? Factors Associated With the Incidence of Workplace Romance1
  9. Walking New Avenues in Management Research Methods and Theories: Bridging Micro and Macro Domains
  10. Bridging Micro- and Macrodomains in I-O Psychology
  11. Debunking Myths and Urban Legends About Meta-Analysis
  12. Meta-Analytic Choices and Judgment Calls: Implications for Theory Building and Testing, Obtained Effect Sizes, and Scholarly Impact
  13. Revival of test bias research in preemployment testing.
  14. Moving beyond a legal‐centric approach to managing workplace romances: organizationally sensible recommendations for HR leaders
  15. Scale Coarseness as a Methodological Artifact
  16. From Charm to Harm: A Content‐Analytic Review of Sexual Harassment Court Cases Involving Workplace Romance
  17. The Frustrating Search for Interaction Effects
  18. Enhancing the relevance of organizational behavior by embracing performance management research
  19. First Decade of Organizational Research Methods
  20. Comparison of Three Meta-Analytic Procedures for Estimating Moderating Effects of Categorical Variables
  21. Software Review: Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P. T., & Rothstein, H. R. (2006). Comprehensive Meta-Analysis (Version 2.2.027) [Computer software]. Englewood, NJ: Biostat
  22. Workplace Romance
  23. Computation of Effect Size for Moderating Effects of Categorical Variables in Multiple Regression
  24. Legal standards, ethical standards, and responses to social–sexual conduct at work
  25. Effect Size and Power in Assessing Moderating Effects of Categorical Variables Using Multiple Regression: A 30-Year Review.
  26. Cautionary Note on Reporting Eta-Squared Values from Multifactor ANOVA Designs
  27. Responding to sexual harassment complaints: Effects of a dissolved workplace romance on decision-making standards
  28. The impact of perceived child physical and sexual abuse history on Native American women's psychological well-being and AIDS risk.
  29. A Generalized Solution for Approximating the Power to Detect Effects of Categorical Moderator Variables Using Multiple Regression
  30. A Framework for Investigating the Link between Workplace Romance and Sexual Harassment
  31. EFFECTS OF A DISSOLVED WORKPLACE ROMANCE AND RATER CHARACTERISTICS ON RESPONSES TO A SEXUAL HARASSMENT ACCUSATION.
  32. Appraisal of the Homogeneity of Error Variance Assumption and Alternatives to Multiple Regression for Estimating Moderating Effects of Categorical Variables
  33. Testing Moderator Variable Hypotheses Meta-Analytically
  34. Factors Associated With Participating in a Romantic Relationship in a Work Environment1
  35. Effects of Nonverbal Behavior on Perceptions of Power Bases
  36. Statistical Power Computations for Detecting Dichotomous Moderator Variables with Moderated Multiple Regression
  37. Heterogeneity of Error Variance and the Assessment of Moderating Effects of Categorical Variables: A Conceptual Review
  38. Improving The Estimation of Moderating Effects by Using Computer-Administered Questionnaires
  39. BODY HEIGHT AND ROMANTIC ATTRACTION: A META-ANALYTIC TEST OF THE MALE-TALLER NORM
  40. Enhancing the Validity of Self-Reported Alcohol and Marijuana Consumption Using a Bogus Pipeline Procedure: A Meta-Analytic Review
  41. Estimating the Power to Detect Dichotomous Moderators with Moderated Multiple Regression
  42. Conditions Under Which a Bogus Pipeline Procedure Enhances the Validity of Self‐Reported Cigarette Smoking: A Meta‐Analytic Review1