All Stories

  1. Changes in the transformative potential of action proposals in Finnish Red Lists from 1986 to 2019
  2. Transformative potential of action proposals in Finnish Red Lists from 1986 to 2019 
  3. Strengthening responsibilities to face global crises: A call to ecologists, environmental scientists and their societies
  4. Listening Deeply to Indigenous People: A Collaborative Perspective and Reflection Between a Mapuche Machi and Ecologists
  5. An interoperable and standardized protocol for reporting systematic conservation planning projects
  6. Role of science and scientists in public environmental policy debates: The case of EU agrochemical and Nature Restoration Regulations
  7. Ecology for a social revolution: Re-defining the role of ecological and environmental science professionals and their responsibilities towards society
  8. An interoperable and standardized protocol for reporting systematic conservation planning projects
  9. The Conguillío Statement on the values and responsibilities of ecologists
  10. Conservation interventions are effective but far from sufficient
  11. Four decades of Red Lists’ action proposals for safeguarding biodiversity: toward transformative change through deeper leverage and mainstreaming
  12. The role of the Red Lists of Ecosystems in leveraging sustainability changes in Finland – perceptions of the assessors
  13. How different conservation actions contribute toward sustainability changes in the society
  14. An overview of reviews of conservation flagships: evaluating fundraising ability and surrogate power
  15. Preferences for different flagship types in fundraising for nature conservation
  16. Materialism, Awareness of Environmental Consequences and Environmental Philanthropic Behaviour Among Potential Donors
  17. Identifying national responsibility species based on spatial conservation prioritization
  18. Incorporating landscape heterogeneity into multi-objective spatial planning improves biodiversity conservation of semi-natural grasslands
  19. The effect of knowledge, species aesthetic appeal, familiarity and conservation need on willingness to donate
  20. Coincidence of High Nature Value farmlands with bird and butterfly diversity
  21. Restoration where it pays off
  22. Association between awareness of environmental consequences, materialism and environmental philanthropic behavior among potential online donors
  23. Integrating Social and Ecological Knowledge for Targeting Voluntary Biodiversity Conservation
  24. The use of knowledge in evidence-informed voluntary conservation of Finnish forests
  25. Matches and mismatches between national and EU-wide priorities: Examining the Natura 2000 network in vertebrate species conservation
  26. Representing Hotspots of Evolutionary History in Systematic Conservation Planning for European Mammals
  27. Green Infrastructure Design Based on Spatial Conservation Prioritization and Modeling of Biodiversity Features and Ecosystem Services
  28. Projecting Global Biodiversity Indicators under Future Development Scenarios
  29. Scaling in Ecology and Biodiversity Conservation
  30. Improving conservation planning for semi-natural grasslands: Integrating connectivity into agri-environment schemes
  31. Edge artefacts and lost performance in national versus continental conservation priority areas
  32. Prioritizing species for conservation planning
  33. Effects of Connectivity and Spatial Resolution of Analyses on Conservation Prioritization across Large Extents
  34. Governance factors in the identification of global conservation priorities for mammals
  35. Administrative regions in conservation: Balancing local priorities with regional to global preferences in spatial planning
  36. Setting conservation targets under budgetary constraints
  37. Costs of Integrating Economics and Conservation Planning
  38. Conservation planning with insects at three different spatial scales
  39. Assessing replacement cost of conservation areas: How does habitat loss influence priorities?
  40. A successful community-level strategy for conservation prioritization
  41. FORUM: Top predators: hot or not? A call for systematic assessment of biodiversity surrogates
  42. Area-Based Refinement for Selection of Reserve Sites with the Benefit-Function Approach
  43. The Value of Biodiversity in Reserve Selection: Representation, Species Weighting, and Benefit Functions