What is it about?

Fundamental problems in language testing concern reliability and validity of test formats. A first focus of discussion is the question whether language proficiency is a unitary competence or rather a divisible competence consisting of the 'four skills' (reading, listening, speaking, writing) and of 'abilities' (syntactic competence, lexical competence, morphological competence, phonological competence, etc.). Depending on the choice, language test formats choose for 'integrative tests' (cloze test e.g.) or skills' tests (reading, listening, speaking, writing). A second issue in the discussion concerns 'direct testing' vs. 'indirect testing'. Direct tests present a task that resembles the actual task in practical language use: 'speaking' is tested by a real speaking test format. Indirect tests present a task that differs from the real language use tas, e.g. testing 'speaking' by a written fill-in format. The discussion focuses on reliability and validity of the test (predictive validity, concurrent validity, face validity, construct validity and content validity). A critical evaluation of the discussion is presented in the article. Especially the problems of so-called communicative tests are discussed in the light of 'norm-referenced testing' vs. 'criterion-referenced testing'

Featured Image

Why is it important?

New experiments in on-line testing of foreign language proficiency might highly benefit from the critical evaluation of the validity and reliability of various test formats as presentede in this article.

Perspectives

Personally, I hope that the critical evaluation of some test formats (cloze, indirect test formats, communicative test formats,...) might contribute to a better complementary selection of test formats to ameliorate 'foreign language proficiency testing'.

Ludo Beheydt
Universite catholique de Louvain

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: Toetsen Van Taalvaardigheid, Onderzoek En Aandachtsgebieden., Toegepaste Taalwetenschap in Artikelen, January 1988, John Benjamins,
DOI: 10.1075/ttwia.32.03beh.
You can read the full text:

Read

Contributors

The following have contributed to this page