What is it about?
How do institutions introduce and advocate for a new concept? What role do metaphors play in legitimization and argumentation? This article answers both questions by analyzing metaphors of cultural diversity at UNESCO. I analyze the metaphors of treasure, common heritage, rainbow river, and biodiversity, and show how they play a depoliticizing role by presenting diversity as tension-free, devoid of power relations, economic interests, or historical context.
Featured Image
Photo by Stephane YAICH on Unsplash
Why is it important?
I analyze a fuzzy and contested concept that has been and continues to be the object of many divergent interpretations. By analyzing the discourse of international institutions that must cater to opposing political needs and interests, I find specific rhetorical strategies that try to reconcile and simplify complex realities. I differentiate between conventional and creative metaphors, I show how these play distinct argumentative roles.
Perspectives
What political role does a concept that seeks to upset nobody play in the sphere of international relations? What argumentative role do metaphors play in international political communication? How do rhetorical strategies help in constructing a worldview through texts, declarations, and discourse, and what is their relation to the world outside of the institution, the world existing in history, geopolitics, and economic interests?
Irit Kornblit
Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: Metaphors of cultural diversity at UNESCO, Metaphor and the Social World, November 2021, John Benjamins,
DOI: 10.1075/msw.20018.kor.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page
