What is it about?
A methodological consequence of a genuinely usage-based approach to constructional/ morphosyntactic change.
Featured Image
Why is it important?
It offers reflection on what a "usage-based" approach to language change entails.
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: The author and the text in radically usage-based diachronic construction grammar, or why historical linguists have started analysing text again, Functions of Language, May 2019, John Benjamins,
DOI: 10.1075/fol.00017.noe.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page
