What is it about?
A review of Packard's 2000 book on Chinese morphology
Featured Image
Why is it important?
Chinese has few affixes and little inflection. How does Chinese morphology compare with languages like English? That is a question that Packard addresses, which ought to be of interest to many linguists.
Perspectives
Packard makes a welcome contribution. There is more to worked out on this topic.
San Duanmu
University of Michigan
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: Review of Packard (2000): The Morphology of Chinese: A linguistic and cognitive approach, Diachronica, October 2002, John Benjamins,
DOI: 10.1075/dia.19.1.10dua.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page
