What is it about?

This case study examines the learning outcomes from a five-year biotechnology project focused on developing and testing a genetically engineered potato in two Asian countries. It looks at how experiential learning methods were applied to train biotechnology professionals and assess their understanding of biosafety practices. The study fills two gaps in the literature: the application of experiential learning in biotechnology and the need for training in biotechnology in developing countries. Using statistical analysis, it compares pre-and post-project data to measure learning gains. The results show significant improvements in biosafety practices, but also highlight the challenges of applying experiential methods in poorly regulated environments. The study emphasizes that effective training requires thorough knowledge, extensive time for practice, mentoring, and simulated trials in local conditions.

Featured Image

Why is it important?

Studying this case is important because it provides valuable insights into the effectiveness of international capacity-building efforts, particularly in biotechnology, and how these initiatives impact the development of countries with emerging scientific and regulatory frameworks. With ongoing discussions about the role of U.S. support in building capacity in other countries, especially in developing nations, this study offers practical evidence on how targeted training programs, such as those in biosafety practices, can lead to measurable improvements. It shows that experiential learning can be a powerful tool for building local expertise, but also highlights the challenges in implementing these methods in contexts with weak regulatory systems. This research can inform future U.S. capacity-building strategies, emphasizing the need for tailored, context-specific approaches that focus on sustainability, local challenges, and long-term impact.

Perspectives

This study evaluates a five-year biotechnology project aimed at developing a genetically engineered potato in two Asian countries, focusing on experiential learning for biosafety training. It found that well-designed, hands-on training programs led to significant improvements in biosafety practices, though challenges exist in poorly regulated environments. As someone with a background in plant biotechnology and now assessing such programs, I see this research as valuable for understanding how tailored, context-specific training methods can be more effective in building capacity in developing countries. It offers insights on improving future international capacity-building efforts.

Dr. Jane Payumo
Michigan State University

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: Case Study: A Roadmap for Developing Capacity in Plant Biotechnology Field Research, September 2021, Sciencedomain International,
DOI: 10.9734/bpi/ctas/v1/12143d.
You can read the full text:

Read

Contributors

The following have contributed to this page