What is it about?
The aim of this article is to defend the thesis that analysis of time meaning within history and philosophy of natural sciences and philosophical anthropology allows making clear the basis of human being. It's opened the opportunity of constructing special model of general understanding of time as a creation of nature or as a creation of human. Two main methods are used: comparative analysis and hermeneutics.
Featured Image
Photo by Srikanta H. U on Unsplash
Why is it important?
Orientation on discretization and virtual nature of cultural interaction, or orientation on mutual tension of limits of cultural and historical process allows connecting philosophy of natural sciences and philosophical anthropology with system of physical categories: energy, weight, distance, etc. It finds an application as in the physical and mathematical sphere so in the field of humanistic studies.
Perspectives
The general conclusion presupposes that neither nature nor human solely creates the time. Time is an imaginary phenomenon connecting human activity and natural processes in the limits of human consciousness.
Dr. Sergey B. Kulikov
Tomsk State Pedagogical University
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: Who Creates the Time: Nature or Human?, Interdisciplinary Description of Complex Systems, January 2015, Croatian Interdisciplinary Society,
DOI: 10.7906/indecs.13.1.15.
You can read the full text:
Resources
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page
