What is it about?

This paper examines how Indian-language poems responded to socialist realism and how poets tried to turn the experiences of the oppressed into meaningful poetry. It asks whether the hopeful, idealized style of socialist realism could really express the harsh realities of Indian society, especially its class divisions, caste oppression, and religious conflict.

Featured Image

Why is it important?

The article is timely because debates about representation, oppression, and ideological pressure are still very much alive in literary studies today. It helps readers understand why some politically committed poetry feels powerful and memorable, while other work slips into slogan, dogma, or artificial optimism. That makes the paper useful not only for specialists in Marxist criticism, but also for students and general readers trying to see how literature responds to unequal social realities. What is especially unique is its comparative and historically layered approach. Instead of focusing on one poet or one language, it tracks a broader Indian literary field and shows how different writers- such as Bishnu Dey, Sri Sri, Subhash Mukhopadhyay, Kaifi Azmi, and later Dalit and revolutionary poets- negotiated the gap between socialist idealism and lived Indian reality. The article is also distinctive because it questions the limits of socialist-realist criticism itself. It argues that critics sometimes judged poetry too rigidly, mistaking artistic complexity, metaphor, myth, and lyric intensity for political weakness. In that sense, the paper opens a more generous and historically aware way of reading progressive poetry.

Perspectives

I feel that the article is important because it does not treat socialist realism as a fixed doctrine; instead, I see it as a living debate that changed across Indian languages and historical contexts. I think the article matters because it asks difficult questions about whether politically committed poetry can still remain truly artistic. the article shows how Indian poets tested its limits and gradually moved toward a more radical and locally grounded poetic expression. I believe this makes the work timely, because readers today are again asking how literature should speak for the oppressed without becoming propaganda.

Prabuddha Ghosh
Jadavpur University

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: From Socialist Realism to a More Radical Poetic Discourse: Indian Context, Contemporary Issues of Literary Studies - International Symposium Proceedings, December 2023, Georgian Comparative Literature Association,
DOI: 10.62119/cils.16.2023.7561.
You can read the full text:

Read

Contributors

The following have contributed to this page