What is it about?

Never in the history of science have we resolved the physical constants from more basic principles (i.e., the geometry of a sphere as a function of the difference between its discrete internal frame and its non-discrete system frame). Using this approach, we resolve expressions for the notions of length, mass, and time using the Pythagorean theorem. We then write anew existing classical expressions as a nomenclature of these fundamental reference measures and counts thereof. This presents a new understanding of existing classical mechanics using a physically independent framework of fundamental measures, with which to unify all descriptions of nature, macroscopic, gravitational and electromagnetic

Featured Image

Why is it important?

There are several changes in nomenclature such as the Planck units, Stoney units, Imperial units and metric units (SI). For the most part, these are understood as mathematical translations of a shared physical description of nature and therein offer no additional benefit beyond the presently accepted SI system. We show this to be not true. Importantly, we resolve fundamental measures as a geometric function of the internal and system frames and then pair those notions with counts of these references. When translating expressions such as Heisenberg's uncertainty principle, we find the measure terms cancel out, leaving only the count terms. This tells us that this description of nature has nothing to do with the reference measures. It describes a geometry. And therein, how one describes nature is extremely important.

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: Measurement Quantization Describes the Physical Constants, International Journal of Theoretical and Mathematical Physics, February 2021, Scientific and Academic Publishing,
DOI: 10.5923/j.ijtmp.20211101.03.
You can read the full text:

Read

Contributors

The following have contributed to this page