What is it about?
This paper examines whether Socrates provides his interlocutors with good reasons to seek knowledge of what virtue is, reasons that they are in a position to appreciate. I argue that in the Laches he does provide such reasons, but they are not the reasons that are most commonly identified as Socratic. Socrates thinks his interlocutors should be motivated not by the idea that virtue is knowledge nor by the idea that knowledge is good for its own sake, but rather by the idea that knowledge is needed to recognize whether we are improving ourselves. His argument reaches the potentially life-altering conclusion that we should all seek knowledge of what virtue is. It is powerful precisely because it relies on uncontroversial premises that his interlocutors could be expected to accept. In laying out this argument, I distinguish different reasons to want a teacher of virtue and, corresponding to these reasons, different types of teachers of virtue. At the end of the article, I situate this argument within the debate about whether virtue is teachable.
Featured Image
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: A New Philosophical Tool in the Meno: 86e-87c, Ancient Philosophy, January 2013, Philosophy Documentation Center,
DOI: 10.5840/ancientphil20133315.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page







