What is it about?
For more than a decade now, a debate has taken place between revisionists and traditionalists about some of the constitutive aspects and the nature of the just war theory. This article argues that revisionism has not been able to provide a practical alternative to the traditional just war theory and that we can satisfy some of the main practical aims of revisionism even within the traditional just war theory framework. The article then briefly introduces the feminist critique of the just war tradition recently presented by Rosemary Kellison and argues that Kellison’s approach promises a more appropriate practical reform programme for the just war debate. Moreover, the practical perspective of Kellison’s account is able to contain some of the aims of revisionism without containing its shortcomings such as its counterintuitive conclusions or deflecting too far from the traditional just war theory.
Featured Image
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: Download Just War Theory: Feminist Critique as a Practical Alternative to Revisionism, Politologický časopis - Czech Journal of Political Science, January 2019, Masaryk University Press,
DOI: 10.5817/pc2019-3-164.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page







