What is it about?
This essay uses the implementation of multilateral environmental agreements (MEAs) in developing countries (specifically, the implementation of the Convention on Biological Diversity in Ghana) to illustrate why and how States can implement international agreements and for that matter comply with international law without necessarily compromising on equally implementing effective policies to meet their domestic responsibility, particularly when such MEAs may be deemed by some as instruments that curtail the enjoyment of benefits from a State’s natural resources and endowments.
Featured Image
Why is it important?
The essay examines the nexus between compliance with international law (international obligation) and meeting domestic responsibility (particularly when the international treaty or agreement to be complied with seems to have some negative implications for the domestic population or State policy). It proposes a new way of understanding the question of compliance in the international system.
Perspectives
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: The Balanced Obligation and the Basis for Compliance in International Law: Reflections on the Question of International Obligation, Journal of Politics and Law, May 2019, Canadian Center of Science and Education,
DOI: 10.5539/jpl.v12n2p23.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page