What is it about?

this article, the definition of trust as a catalyst is proposed based on a deduction from an aggregation of peer-reviewed articles from across several disciplines and hermeneutic examination of the contents. The paper suggests that discipline-related points of view and common usage of trust as a noun and or a verb leads to confusion in trying to develop a consensual definition. Given the accepted universality of trust, a consensual definition would help achieve a further understanding of both trust and trust-building. The proposed definition permits recognition of discipline-related definitions and suggests the focus of trust should be directed to establishing the conditions under which trust enables successful exchange interactions (i.e., trust-building). The separation of trust and trust-building has implications for management and other relationships. Suggestions for further research are included.

Featured Image

Why is it important?

There is no consensus across disciplines on a definition of trust, and this paper proposes a definition of trust that avoids discipline-related defitions

Perspectives

The publication is less restricted by academic parameters that require statistical methodologies, and permits challenging existing beliefs.

Doctor Peter Charles King
Beijing University of Technology

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: Definition of Trust as a Catalyst and the Implications Therefrom: A Deduction from a Literature Review, Journal of Management and Sustainability, May 2021, Canadian Center of Science and Education,
DOI: 10.5539/jms.v11n2p15.
You can read the full text:

Read

Contributors

The following have contributed to this page