What is it about?

Seneca describes the end of the world in many ways. He focusses on the sage, who initially stays apart from the apocalypse but sometimes takes part on it, without losing his tranquility. This depends on Seneca's stoic struggle to participate to the government of the State in some way, even if the situation is desperate. Moreover, Seneca's end is realized mostly by water. This is inconsistent with Stoic theory, which maintains that the world will be destroyed by fire. Seneca's choice probably intended to avoid any hint at the fire of Rome, the responsibility of which was ascribed to Nero.

Featured Image

Why is it important?

It offers a political reading of the narration of the Flood in NQ 3.27-30.

Perspectives

The article explains some of Seneca's philosophical inconsistencies in the light of his political committment.

Dr Francesca Romana Berno
Universita degli Studi di Roma La Sapienza

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: Apocalypses and the Sage. Different Endings of the World in SenecaApocalypses and the Sage. Different Endings of the World in Seneca, Gerión Revista de Historia Antigua, April 2019, Universidad Complutense de Madrid (UCM),
DOI: 10.5209/geri.63869.
You can read the full text:

Read

Contributors

The following have contributed to this page