What is it about?
There are two ways of dealing with the environmental pollution problem separating environmentally dirty traditional markets from environmentally clean markets, using dwarf green markets and using green markets. If the goal is to transition from environmentally dirty traditional economies to environmentally clean economies, then understanding which one is friendly and which one is not friendly with such a transition is important for policy making based on science and for understanding the reasons behind non-science-based policy decision-making. And this makes the following topic and question relevant: Dwarf green markets versus green markets: Which one is environmentally clean economy transition friendly? Why? Among the goals of this paper is to provide answers to these questions.
Featured Image
Photo by Nathan Anderson on Unsplash
Why is it important?
If we are going to transition one day to a world under environmentally clean markets we need to understand which one is friendly to the transition, green markets or dwarf green markets.
Perspectives
The use of dwarf green markets since 2012 instead of green markets means that we have led to world through a development path that is delinked from transitioning to environmentally clean markets one day as they work under permanent environmental market failure and ongoing government intervention.
Mr. Lucio Muñoz
Independent QLC researcher
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: Sustainability Thought 181: Dwarf Green Markets Versus Green Markets: Which one is Environmentally Clean Economy Transition Friendly? Why?, Sumerianz Journal of Business Management and Marketing, September 2024, Sumerianz Publication,
DOI: 10.47752/sjav.73.58.65.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page
