What is it about?

In this paper the authors describe how the use of multiple methods of qualitative data collection over a two-year period, including interviews, concept maps and journals, and the analysis of data through visual inquiry, categorizing (constant comparison thematic analysis), and connecting (narrative analysis) provided a more comprehensive understanding of the process of evolution in college teachers’ perspectives on teaching and learning within a professional development program than would have emerged with only a single method . Concept maps provided an initial visual footprint of teachers’ emerging perspectives. Categorization revealed four major patterns across teachers’ perspectives. Connecting the data through narrative summaries exposed a contextualized rendition of aspects of individual teachers’ perspectives. Each of these three approaches offers a unique lens into qualitative data analysis, and when used together, they clarify important aspects of the phenomenon under investigation.

Featured Image

Why is it important?

This article shows with helpful visuals how thematic (categorizing) and narrative (connecting) analyses are complementary and can provide a deeper understanding of the research results than either one would on their own.

Perspectives

Maxwell and Miller (2008) first published the idea that thematic and narrative analyses are complementary and enhance understanding. My research since then has shown this to be true and validates this idea.

Professor Lynn Butler-Kisber
McGill University

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: Deepening Understanding in Qualitative Inquiry, The Qualitative Report, May 2016, Nova Southeastern University,
DOI: 10.46743/2160-3715/2016.2623.
You can read the full text:

Read

Contributors

The following have contributed to this page