What is it about?

The study evaluates the impact of Mr. Trivedi’s biofield energy treatment on Pseudomonas aeruginosa (P. aeruginosa) to evaluate its phenotypic and genotypic characteristics.

Featured Image

Why is it important?

Based on the study results, it was found that the cefotaxime sensitivity was changed, while decrease in MIC value was reported in case of cefotaxime (i.e. 32 to ≤ 8 µg/mL), cefotetan (i.e. >32 to 32 µg/mL) and ESBL-b Scrn (i.e. >1 to ≤1 µg/mL) as compared with the control. The biochemical reaction of nitrate was altered followed by a change in biotype number (02063722) in treated group as compared to the control biotype number (02063726). Using five RAPD markers, the sample was characterized and showed 30 to 50% interspecific polymorphic relationship with P. aeruginosa after biofield treatment as compared to the control. After biofield treatment, molecular analysis using 16S rDNA analysis showed that the sample was detected as Pseudomonas aeruginosa with 99% identity. So, it can be concluded that Mr. Trivedi’s biofield energy treatment on P. aeruginosa has an impact in altering the sensitivity of antimicrobials, which might be used as an alternative therapy (healing treatment) in future.

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: Antibiogram, Biochemical Reactions, and Genotypic Pattern of Biofield Treated Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Journal of Tropical Diseases, January 2016, OMICS Publishing Group,
DOI: 10.4172/2329-891x.1000181.
You can read the full text:

Read

Resources

Contributors

The following have contributed to this page