What is it about?
Comments on Highly Sensitive & Low Cost Colorimetric Method for Quantifying Arsenic Metal in Drinking Water of Malwa Punjab and Comparison with ICAP-AES, has been presented. There is no validation of this new developed method using recovery/standard addition method, optimization of variables pH, reagent concentration, λ max, nor any study of effect of foreign ions/tolerance limits and its comparison with EPA-standard method reported in the literature, instrument manufacturer/models, etc. Moreover, the procedure described in the manuscript is practically impossible. There is no update of literature survey on arsenic determination in water. The authors claims are selfcontradictory, highly misleading and has no scientific basis.
Featured Image
Why is it important?
The authors claims are self contradictory, highly misleading and has no scientific basis.
Perspectives
The authors claims are selfcontradictory, highly misleading and has no scientific basis.
Dr DPS RATHORE FRSC FICS M-ACS
Atomic Minerals Directorate for Exploration and Research
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: Quantifying Arsenic Metal in Drinking Water, Comments on: Highly Sensitive & Low Cost Colorimetric Method for Quantifying Arsenic Metalin Drinking Water of Malwa Punjab and Comparison With ICAP-AES by Sidhu et al., Journal of Chromatography & Separation Techniques, January 2017, OMICS Publishing Group,
DOI: 10.4172/2157-7064.1000386.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page
