Publication not explained

This publication has not yet been explained in plain language by the author(s). However, you can still read the publication.

If you are one of the authors, claim this publication so you can create a plain language summary to help more people find, understand and use it.

Featured Image

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: Clinical outcome, and survival between primary percutaneous coronary intervention versus fibrinolysis in patients older than 60 years with acute myocardial infarction, Heart Views, January 2012, Medknow,
DOI: 10.4103/1995-705x.105728.
You can read the full text:

Read
Open access logo

Contributors

The following have contributed to this page