What is it about?
The comprehensive review of DEMATEL conducted in this study has revealed that the technique is capable of dealing with complex problems in a variety of areas. Results from the bibliometric analysis show that the number of research outputs involving DEMATEL is steadily increasing, and more than 776 documents will be published in 2025. Additionally, the network of DEMATEL users is expanding, with the technique being implemented in a variety of different subject areas. Research zones are also increasing, and financing opportunities for research using DEMATEL are increasing.
Featured Image
Photo by David Armstrong on Unsplash
Why is it important?
This study showed that DEMATEL is capable to remain among the DM tools for the time being, correspondingly, the authors invite additional research to remark on the performance of other MADMs to eliminate outdated techniques from practices.
Perspectives
Considering the spawning of new MADMs in recent years, we attempt to comment on the performance of the classic DEMATEL.
Dr Nader Ale Ebrahim
Alzahra University
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: Performance of the decision-making trial and evaluation laboratory, AIMS Mathematics, January 2023, American Institute of Mathematical Sciences (AIMS),
DOI: 10.3934/math.2023376.
You can read the full text:
Resources
Performance of the Decision-Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory
This study presents a comprehensive review of DEMATEL through bibliometric analysis using the Scopus database.
Performance of the decision-making trial and evaluation laboratory
Overlay view of top 50 "Author's keywords" co-occurrence network
Figure 4. of Performance of the decision-making trial and evaluation laboratory
Country collaboration map of "DEMATEL" data set from 1981-2023; the gray area means zero documents, and the blue shade from light to dark represents one to 1,040 publications (China)
Performance of the Decision-Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory
Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4327321
A short clip abou "Performance of the Decision-Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory" paper
This article examined 3,521 papers published in journals, conferences or books between 1981 and 2023. We examined a few parameters for commenting on the performance of the technique. Among them are research outputs, the network of DEMATEL users, implementation subject areas, research zones, financing opportunities and publication hosts and their impact trends.
Full text of Performance of the decision-making trial and evaluation laboratory
Multiple attribute decision-making (MADM) techniques constitute a practical approach for solving complex problems involving multiple and often conflicting criteria. Decision-making trial and evaluation laboratory (DEMATEL) is a popular MADM technique with both admirers and critics. This study presents a comprehensive review of DEMATEL through bibliometric analysis using the Scopus database. This article examined 3,521 papers published in journals, conferences or books between 1981 and 2023. We examined a few parameters for commenting on the performance of the technique. Among them are research outputs, the network of DEMATEL users, implementation subject areas, research zones, financing opportunities and publication hosts and their impact trends. We conclude from the findings of this study that the DEMATEL is capable of dealing with modern problem-solving in future environments. Although the growth of new MADMs is obvious, based on the gathered data, we forecast that more than 776 documents will be published in 2025 using DEMATEL for problem-solving. This expanding tendency will continue in the future. As distinct MADMs have diverse constraints, foundations, computing complexity and standpoints, which result in different performances, outmoded low-performance MADM techniques must be reported by researchers to continue this paper's objective to minimize ambiguity among decision-makers and practitioners. To facilitate such a comparison in the future, a quantitative performance coefficient was also developed here.
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page
