What is it about?
This study compares three different control strategies—PI, LQR, and Sliding Mode Control—used to keep water levels steady in two connected tanks. These systems are often found in industries like water treatment and chemical processing. The research shows how each controller handles changes and disturbances in two types of systems: one where the tanks work independently, and another where they interact and affect each other. The study finds that while all controllers can work well, the Sliding Mode Controller performs best when the system becomes more complex or unpredictable. This helps engineers choose the right control method based on the system’s needs and challenges.
Featured Image
Why is it important?
Controlling fluid levels in industrial tank systems is critical for safe and efficient operation, but it becomes especially difficult when systems are nonlinear or when tanks interact. What makes this study unique is its head-to-head comparison of three widely used control strategies—PI, LQR, and Sliding Mode Control—under both simple and complex configurations. Unlike most previous studies, this work includes both linear and nonlinear analysis, disturbance testing, and performance metrics like overshoot and settling time. The findings help engineers and researchers choose the most suitable control method for real-world applications, improving reliability and performance in processes like water treatment, chemical production, and energy systems.
Perspectives
This publication holds a very special place for me, as it combines both my academic passion and my practical experience in industrial control systems. It was born from a genuine desire to help engineers and practitioners better understand how different control strategies behave when applied to real-world challenges—especially when dealing with nonlinear processes or interacting tanks, which are common in many industries. What I found most rewarding was the opportunity to bring together theory and application in a clear, structured, and comparative way. It was important to me that the results not only be technically sound, but also useful for those who work daily with these systems. I truly hope this work becomes a helpful resource for anyone involved in control system design or process optimization. Personally, I’m grateful for the teamwork, discussions, and support that went into this project. It reflects not just research, but a shared commitment to practical impact and continuous learning. I look forward to extending this work further and continuing to explore solutions that can improve the way we control and understand complex industrial systems.
José Manuel Campos Salazar
Universitat Politecnica de Catalunya
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: Dynamic analysis and comparison of the performance of linear and nonlinear controllers applied to a nonlinear non-interactive and interactive process, AIMS Electronics and Electrical Engineering, January 2024, Tsinghua University Press,
DOI: 10.3934/electreng.2024021.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page
