What is it about?
We are used to a narrative that says society has gradually become more truthful and that science is the bearer of that truthfulness - the scientization of truth. My article confirms the proposition that - even within science - there are "regimes of truth" that claim, dispute or concede their objects in any given conjuncture. Specifically, in the context of town planning in mid-century Britain, I argue that town planners invoked scientific credentials from the very beginning of statutory planning, but that it was the science of the "social" that triumphed after WW2, defending families, communities and regions against irresponsible economic forces. Map-based standard-setting in defense of the social was the ambient technique of power in everyday planning practice. The economic discourse referenced in the US as a quantitative, model-building discipline could not enter this politico-administrative space until internal contradictions in the map and standard were worked through in the early 60s.
Featured Image
Why is it important?
There are very few case studies of methods and techniques used in British planning practice. This paper ranges across the professional planning literature of the period 1920 to 1965 to reconstruct the methods in use, and their conditions of possibility.
Perspectives
I have re-worked original documentary evidence collected for my 1986 PhD thesis in the light of forty years subsequent scholarship to present a fresh take on what planners do and how.
Mark Long
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: Genealogy of method in early modern British planning practice 1920–1965, Town Planning Review, June 2025, Liverpool University Press,
DOI: 10.3828/tpr.2025.17.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page







