What is it about?
Abstract This essay offers a critical reading of J. M. Coetzee’s 库切 novelistic legacy from both Disgrace (o.p. 1999) and Elizabeth Costello (o.p. 2003). It explores the problematic issues with representations of animals and its inter-“connection” between literature and the larger physical world (Mohamad Ali Hassan Alakhdar, 2019; Alakhdar, 2012; Alakhdar, 2019). On the other hand, it mitigates the public narrative web of social others within anthropocentric and biocentric perspectives (Wagner 2017; Miller 米勒 1988; Watt 1957; Hale 多萝西・J. 黑尔 1989; Hale 多萝西・J. 黑尔 1998; Johnson 2002; Mahfouz-Brown 張仲思 March 5, 2015; Caillois 1942; Zhu 2024; Zola 1960-1967; Lukács 1950; Lukács 1920).
Featured Image
Photo by Xiangkun ZHU on Unsplash
Why is it important?
Categories Education in Professional Areas Moral Education in Normative Ethics Philosophy of Higher Education in Philosophy of Social Science
Perspectives
Keywords J. M. Coetzee 库切 Elizabeth Costello Ethics Academic libraries Instructional design Library instruction Information literacy Active learning Oral communication Technology Telephone
Vivien Jiaqian Zhu 朱嘉倩
Stanford University
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: Agree to (Dis)agree: A Shifting Point of View of the Disgraceful Other David Lurie in J. M. Coetzee’s Disgrace (o.p. 1999), The Journal of Education Insights, January 2025, Omniscient Pte Ltd,
DOI: 10.37155/2972-4856-jei0304-3.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page
