Just energy transitions: Coal mining areas and welfare policies

What is it about?

This thesis explores the socioeconomic consequences of transitioning to renewable energy sources, particularly focusing on fairness and potential policy actions within the Welfare States. A literature review reveals that renewable energy has a positive impact on employment but can negatively affect income due to rising electricity costs and regressive subsidies, suggesting the need for further research. The thesis then examines the case of León, where coal mining and thermoelectric power are shifting to renewable energy sources. A modelling exercise predicts short-term job compensation through renewables but recommends additional activities like rural tourism and agroindustry to retain the local population. It also highlights the trade-offs between employment and land use changes. The study analyses the role of Welfare States in facilitating the energy transition, rejecting the hypothesis that Nordic countries excel in sustainable resource mobilisation. Instead, it suggests the potential implementation of Conservation Basic Incomes and Services within Social-democratic regimes.

Featured Image

Photo by Derek Sutton on Unsplash

Photo by Derek Sutton on Unsplash

Why is it important?

This thesis holds significance because it delves into the socioeconomic impacts of transitioning to renewable energy sources, emphasising the importance of fairness and justice in the process. It offers valuable policy insights by revealing disparities between objectives and outcomes, especially in the context of a specific case study in León. Additionally, the analysis of the role of Welfare States and the exploration of eco-social synergy contribute to the ongoing discussions about resource mobilisation and sustainable welfare systems.