What is it about?
Geometric Transformation: Reformulates non-convex constraint spaces into a union of convex affine pieces (piecewise linear structure via Boolean "OR" logic). Avoiding the Maratos Effect: By smoothing the optimization trajectory along a convex local manifold, gradient-based algorithms preserve full Newton steps and superlinear convergence without needing non-smooth penalty functions or watchdog methods
Featured Image
Why is it important?
Eliminating constraint curvature via piecewise affine reformulation neutralizes the Maratos effect by rewriting the non-convex feasible region as a union of convex polyhedral sets. This flat trajectory enables full Newton-type steps along active facets without step-size reductions, ensuring fast convergence.
Perspectives
Analyzing the framework of Disjunctive Programming and Piecewise Convexity for numerical optimization reveals several distinct perspectives, ranging from pure mathematical theory to real-world power systems engineering. The Theoretical Optimization PerspectiveThe Maratos Effect Resolution: Traditionally, optimization algorithms bypass the Maratos effect (where a good step is rejected because it temporarily increases constraint violation) using complex "watchdog" techniques or non-smooth filter methods. This framework offers a geometric alternative: flattening the constraints removes the curvature that causes the effect in the first place, allowing standard line-search or trust-region methods to achieve superlinear convergence unimpeded.Disjunctive Mechanics: By treating non-convexity as a discrete selection among convex subsets (using Boolean logic), the problem shifts from navigating rugged, non-convex terrain to traversing well-behaved, flat intersecting planes.
Mr Nikolaos Panagis Theodorakatos
ECE NTUA
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: Disjunctive Programming and Piecewise Convexity: An Algorithmic Trajectory Analysis Toward Stationary Points to Avoid the Maratos Effect in Numerical Optimization, Mathematics, September 2026, MDPI AG,
DOI: 10.3390/math14183256.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page







