What is it about?
Logistical and economic modeling of power generation from biomass and costs of carbon capture and storage.
Featured Image
Why is it important?
Relevant to understanding potential scale and cost of a range of carbon-drawdown options.
Perspectives
Results suggest that BECCS should be considered as a negative-emissions CO2 strategy.
Matthew Langholtz
Oak Ridge National Laboratory
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: The Economic Accessibility of CO2 Sequestration through Bioenergy with Carbon Capture and Storage (BECCS) in the US, Land, August 2020, MDPI AG,
DOI: 10.3390/land9090299.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page
