What is it about?
This article explores the response to the 26 December 2018 earthquake on Mount Etna’s eastern flank, which damaged over 3,000 buildings. It describes how scientists, government officials, and local communities worked together to rebuild in safer ways. Instead of reconstructing in high-risk zones, damaged buildings were relocated, and hazardous areas were transformed into public spaces like gardens and parking lots. The strategy combined geological research, ethical decision-making, and psychological support for displaced residents.
Featured Image
Photo by Piermanuele Sberni on Unsplash
Why is it important?
Because it offers a new model for disaster recovery—one that prioritizes safety, transparency, and long-term resilience. In a country like Italy, rich in cultural heritage but vulnerable to earthquakes, this approach shows that rebuilding can be both respectful of history and forward-thinking. It also highlights the power of clear communication and community involvement in managing natural hazards.
Perspectives
The Etna case sets a precedent for future disaster responses, not only in Italy but worldwide. It demonstrates how integrating geoscience with ethical planning and community engagement can reduce risk and improve outcomes. As climate change and urban expansion increase vulnerability, this kind of holistic strategy will be essential for building safer, more resilient societies.
Dr Marco Neri
Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: Integrating Geoscience, Ethics, and Community Resilience: Lessons from the Etna 2018 Earthquake, Geosciences, September 2025, MDPI AG,
DOI: 10.3390/geosciences15090333.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page
