What is it about?

Eleven processes for forest-related criteria and indicators were analysed. Up to 171 countries are members of this forest related processes We found varying levels of implementation across countries and regions. Common achievements of the processes are presented. Success factors for criteria and indicator implementation are proposed.

Featured Image

Why is it important?

All eleven processes for forest-related criteria and indicators were analysed.

Perspectives

I wrote this article with co-authors from the IUFRO WP 9.01.05 on Research and Development of SFM Indicators. The co-authors represent all regions in the world and are also long experienced in C&I for SFM work. Thus our paper provide insights and information for a very broad range of interested readers.

Dr. Stefanie Linser
niversity of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna (BOKU)

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: 25 Years of Criteria and Indicators for Sustainable Forest Management: Why Some Intergovernmental C&I Processes Flourished While Others Faded, Forests, August 2018, MDPI AG,
DOI: 10.3390/f9090515.
You can read the full text:

Read

Contributors

The following have contributed to this page