What is it about?
Recent studies on users of urban parks call for the need for more insight into the importance of green spaces as catalysts of more inclusive spaces. This paper contributes to the ongoing debate by examining urban parks as age-inclusive infrastructures in a post-socialist context. Three parks in the City of Timișoara, Romania, are selected as a comparative case study. Our analysis combines systematic field observations and GIS-based mapping of park accessibility and facilities with 42 semi-structured interviews with young, mid-aged and older visitors to the three contrasting parks: a renovated historic central park, a peripheral forest-like park and a small neighbourhood park embedded in a communist-era housing estate.
Featured Image
Photo by Juan Ordonez on Unsplash
Why is it important?
The findings suggest that inclusiveness for all generational categories, as well as attachment for neighbourhood parks, are important drivers for urban parks users. Inclusiveness is driven not only by amenities, but also by park-specific attachment, as well as the quality of maintenance and lighting. These factors shape perceived equity and convenience. We advocate for a differentiated management model tailored to each park, balancing conservation-oriented quiet zones with flexible, event-capable areas. This model prioritises lighting, seating ergonomics and safety measures as core components of age-inclusive planning.
Perspectives
Our findings support the need for different management of urban green spaces that capitalises on the social and spatial specificities of each park. The comparison further shows that the smallest and least equipped park generates the strongest attachment and the most regular use across all generations: proximity and continuity of maintenance matter more than surface area or scale of investment.
Dr Remus Cretan
west university of Timisoara
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: Urban Parks as Inclusive Spaces: Generational Perspectives from Timișoara, Romania, Forests, September 2026, MDPI AG,
DOI: 10.3390/f17091091.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page
