Some of the content on this page has been created using generative AI.
What is it about?
The study aimed to identify research priorities in the social sciences concerning Long Covid by collaborating with patients, families, carers, healthcare professionals, and volunteers involved with Long Covid support groups. Using purposive sampling, the study conducted two online surveys to gather input from stakeholders, identifying 253 questions of concern, which were then refined into 55 categorized questions. In the second survey, participants ranked their top 10 questions from this list, resulting in nine final research questions prioritized by at least 50% of respondents. These questions focused on areas such as treatments, financial support, reinfections, healthcare training, mental health, research funding, airborne transmission, patient-informed therapeutics, and socioeconomic impacts. The study highlighted the importance of incorporating diverse perspectives in research prioritization and outlined a collaborative agenda for future social scientific research on Long Covid. The methods employed involved survey design, participant recruitment, and the prioritization of research questions through a structured four-phase process.
Featured Image
Photo by Fusion Medical Animation on Unsplash
Why is it important?
This study is important as it addresses the pressing need to prioritize research on Long Covid, a condition affecting millions globally, by focusing on social scientific aspects that have been underexplored. By involving a diverse group of stakeholders, including patients, healthcare professionals, and volunteers, the research ensures that the identified priorities reflect the real-world concerns and needs of those directly impacted by Long Covid. This collaborative approach not only highlights crucial areas requiring immediate attention but also sets a precedent for similar methodologies to be applied in other research fields, thereby enhancing the relevance and applicability of scientific investigations to societal challenges. Key Takeaways: 1. Collaborative Priority Setting: The study effectively engaged various stakeholders to develop a comprehensive list of research priorities, underscoring the importance of collaborative efforts in addressing complex health issues like Long Covid. 2. Diverse Research Focus: Nine key research questions were prioritized, covering areas such as treatments, financial support, and mental health impacts, illustrating the multifaceted nature of Long Covid and the need for a broad approach in research. 3. Novel Themes Identified: While some issues mirrored previous findings, the study also uncovered new themes, highlighting the value of including diverse perspectives to enrich the research agenda and ensure it addresses emerging concerns.
AI notice
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: Co-creating a social science research agenda for Long Covid, Frontiers in Public Health, November 2025, Frontiers,
DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1654488.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page







