What is it about?
Shows how infected hosts take advantage of proliferating pathogens’ vulnerability to stress. Pathogens generally must proliferate at infected sites to be pathogenic, while effector immune cells and resident tissue cells don’t need to proliferate at infected sites. Therefore, the pathogens are much more vulnerable to any type of stress. It is argued that an overlooked function of immune cells is to actively make infected sites stressful to preferentially harm the more vulnerable pathogens (including infected host cells). This view forces a rethink of many of the paradigms of immunometabolism, immunology, and pathology.
Featured Image
Photo by Elena Mozhvilo on Unsplash
Why is it important?
The title says why it’s important! Table 1 lists TWELVE changes to existing paradigms that logically follow from examining the consequences of proliferating pathogens’ vulnerability to stress.
Perspectives
Everyone knows the advantage that pathogens have for rapid evolution based on rapid proliferation. This paper looks at the flip side—surprisingly ignored!
Dr Edmund K LeGrand
University of Tennessee Knoxville
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: Beyond nutritional immunity: immune-stressing challenges basic paradigms of immunometabolism and immunology, Frontiers in Nutrition, February 2025, Frontiers,
DOI: 10.3389/fnut.2025.1508767.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page







