What is it about?

Arthur Danto’s analytic theory of art relies on a form of artistic interpretation that requires access to the art theoretical concepts of the artworld, ‘an atmosphere of artistic theory, a knowledge of the history of art: an artworld’. Art, in what Danto refers to as post-history, has become theoretical, yet I contend that his explanation of the artist’s creative style lacks a theoretical dimension. Here, I examine Danto’s account of style in light of the role the artistic metaphor plays in the interpretation of the artwork, arguing that it is unable to account for the metaphorical power he claims is embedded within the work of art.

Featured Image

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: The Imperceptibility of Style in Danto's Theory of Art: Metaphor and the Artist's Knowledge, CounterText, December 2015, Edinburgh University Press,
DOI: 10.3366/count.2015.0028.
You can read the full text:

Read

Contributors

The following have contributed to this page