What is it about?
The case of Ukeje v. Ukeje raises important questions about ways in which universal human rights are to be applied and their impact on culturally diverse societies such as patrilineal and matrilineal communities. Although the Constitution is supreme, the various ethnic groups actually gave themselves the Constitution, subject to amendment if it disparaged their cultural diversity. This article appraises similar developments in Ghana, Tanzania, Kenya, Zambia, Uganda, South Africa and the South-Pacific, examining the challenges and limitations when daughters get married in patrilineal societies and when sons get married in matrilineal communities. Reform is advocated through the enactment of modernised Succession Acts such as those found in Kenya and Zambia where courts are given powers to determine inheritance cases according to their peculiarities and to impose statutory trusts for sale where necessary.
Featured Image
Photo by Annie Spratt on Unsplash
Why is it important?
ANNULMENT OF DISCRIMINATORY CUSTOM AND ITS IMPACT ON MATRILINEAL AND PATRILINEAL SOCIETIES/PEOPLE
Perspectives
ANNULMENT OF DISCRIMINATORY CUSTOM AND ITS IMPACT ON MATRILINEAL AND PATRILINEAL SOCIETIES/PEOPLE
Associate Professor Emuobo Emudainohwo
Faculty of Law, Delta State University, Oleh Campus, Oleh, Nigeria
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: Annulment of Discriminatory Custom and its Impact on Matrilineal and Patrilineal Societies/People, African Journal of International and Comparative Law, May 2024, Edinburgh University Press,
DOI: 10.3366/ajicl.2024.0484.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page







