Review of Boeschoten's Dictionary of Early Middle Turkic

What is it about?

This review by Orçun Ünal discusses Hendrik Boeschoten's "A Dictionary of Early Middle Turkic". While acknowledging it fills a significant gap in Turkological studies, the review presents several criticisms regarding its structure, proposed etymologies, missing bibliography and editions, and typographical errors. Ünal offers alternative etymologies and corrections for numerous entries and points out missing lexemes. Despite its value, the review concludes the dictionary has shortcomings.

Featured Image

Photo by Anatol Rurac on Unsplash

Photo by Anatol Rurac on Unsplash

Why is it important?

This review is important because it critically assesses Boeschoten's "A Dictionary of Early Middle Turkic", a work aiming to fill a significant gap in Turkology. Ünal's review highlights the dictionary's shortcomings in structure, etymologies, and missing bibliographic information, offering corrections and alternative analyses. Despite acknowledging its value, the review points out areas needing improvement for a more complete and practical resource. Ünal's detailed critique is crucial for future lexicographical work on Early Middle Turkic.