What is it about?
It has become common to use the phrases ‘global North’ (to refer to developed countries) and ‘global South’ (to refer to developing countries). The gaps between these two groups are still growing. For example, there is a growing gap between levels of education and income. This divide is beginning to affect discussions around climate change. Each group thinks the other side bears more responsibility for causing (and tackling) climate change. Developed nations have higher levels of human and industrial activity. This means they cause the majority of the world’s greenhouse gas emissions. However, they say that developing nations are responsible for the majority of damage to the environment, and that developing nations must take equal responsibility for protecting biodiversity and reducing emissions. Developing nations think this is a sneaky attempt to control and limit their development, in the name of environmentalism. This debate started at the United Nations Conference in Stockholm in 1972. Since then, many conferences and policies have tried to bring different countries together to reduce global warming. These efforts have sometimes highlighted inequalities between countries and increased the divide.
Photo by Anne Nygård on Unsplash
Why is it important?
All countries bear some responsibility for global warming. Developed countries need to do better at demonstrating support for sustainable growth in underprivileged countries. It is important that policies to tackle climate change be fair, based on contribution. KEY TAKEAWAY: The North–South divide makes it harder to work together to tackle climate change. All countries need to feel they are equally represented, and that goals are fair for all, if we are to make progress together.
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: Climate Change and Global Environmental Politics: North-South Divide, Environmental Policy and Law, October 2017, IOS Press, DOI: 10.3233/epl-170022.
You can read the full text:
What if our response to climate change was more like our response to COVID-19?
Both climate change and COVID-19 represent a growing trend: threats that affect everyone around the world, and where both the causes and the solutions a complex mix of political, economic, social and technological factors. These kinds of threats need strong governance at international, national and local levels. In the case of COVID-19, governments acted relatively quickly and firmly. This same kind of leadership is needed in tackling the challenges of climate change.
How global warming created by developed countries then spreads to developing countries
Industrial countries are causing global warming. Their high emissions raise temperatures locally. The high levels of carbon dioxide are then moved around in the atmosphere so that less developed areas suffer too.
What are the recommendations for governments from the latest climate research?
The more carbon dioxide there is in our atmosphere, the faster the earth heats up. This causes environmental changes that can be bad for human health. Carbon dioxide emissions are increasing, and nature’s own solutions are becoming less effective. We must invest more heavily in reducing carbon emissions, and design better laws and business models to encourage this.
Eight Ways in Which the US Can Realistically Become Carbon Neutral
Scientists have shown it is possible for the United States to cut its carbon emissions to zero – and this can be done at a cost of just $1 per person per day. Here’s the plan – now let’s put it into action.
Climate Change Knowledge Cooperative
Explore the wider collection of climate change research summaries.
Be the first to contribute to this page